2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2006.04.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overview of in-situ applicable nitrate removal processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
76
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 244 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
1
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of these technologies focus 62 on ex situ treatments, which are inherently more expensive than in situ treatments due to 63 energy consumption and the interference with surface activities (e.g., building a treatment 64 plant) (Della Rocca et al, 2007). Biological denitrification, which is known as Enhanced In situ 65 4 Biodenitrification (EIB), has environmental and economic advantages over other methods 66 because it is simple, selective, and cost effective (Smith et al, 2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these technologies focus 62 on ex situ treatments, which are inherently more expensive than in situ treatments due to 63 energy consumption and the interference with surface activities (e.g., building a treatment 64 plant) (Della Rocca et al, 2007). Biological denitrification, which is known as Enhanced In situ 65 4 Biodenitrification (EIB), has environmental and economic advantages over other methods 66 because it is simple, selective, and cost effective (Smith et al, 2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different technologies are available to reduce the concentration of nitrates in drinking water, such as Biological Denitrification, Ion Exchange, Reverse Osmosis and Electrodialysis [9,11].…”
Section: Electrodialysis Aapplied To Nitrate Contaminated Potable Watermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physical and chemical processes such as reverse osmosis, ion exchange and electrodialysis are considered the best available technologies (BAT) to treat nitrate-contaminated water (Haugen et al 2002). In spite of the high efficiency to remove nitrate, BATs are expensive and present an elevated technological complexity (Della Rocca et al 2007) compared to biological nitrate removal (Robertson et al 2000;Su and Puls 2006;). Nitrate can be reduced mainly to dinitrogen gas by the activity of heterotrophic bacteria using organic carbon as the source of electrons (Rivett et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, solid carbon sources (e.g. chitin, cotton, sawdust, wheat straw, poly-b-hydroxybutyrate, poly-e-caprolactone, and polylactic acid) that simultaneously serve as a biofilm carrier and as a source of organic carbon for denitrification were tested mainly at laboratory scale (Hiraishi and Khan 2003;Della Rocca et al 2005;Della Rocca et al 2007;Soejima et al 2010). The use of cotton provided a good nitrate removal performance, but total organic carbon was consistently released to the water (Della Rocca et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%