Overview of KAGRA: KAGRA science

Akutsu, T.; Ando, Masaki; Arai, K.; Arai, Y.; Araki, S.; Araya, Akito; Aritomi, N.; Asada, Hideki; Aso, Y.; Bae, S.; Bae, Yeong Bok; Baiotti, Luca; Bajpai, R.; Barton, M. A.; Cannon, K. C.; Cao, Zhoujian; Capocasa, E.; Chan, M.; Chen, C.; Chen, K.; Chen, Y.; Chiang, C-Y.; Chu, Hong‐Yu; Chu, Y-K.; Eguchi, S.; Enomoto, Y.; Flaminio, R.; Fujii, Yoshinori; Fujikawa, F.; Fukunaga, Masataka; Fukushima, Mitsuhiro; Gao, D.; Ge, G.; Ha, S.; Hagiwara, A.; Haino, S.; Han, Wen-Biao; Hasegawa, K.; Hattori, Kentaro; Hayakawa, Hisao; Hayama, K.; Himemoto, Y.; Hiranuma, Y.; Hirata, N.; Hirose, E.; Zhou, Hong; Hsieh, B-H.; Huang, C-Z.; Huang, H-Y.; Huang, P.; Huang, Y-C.; Huang, Yumei; Hui, D. C. Y.; Ide, S.; Ikenoue, B.; Imam, S.; Inayoshi, Kohei; Inoue, Yuki; Ioka, Kunihito; Ito, K.; Itoh, Y.; Izumi, K.; Jeon, C.; Jin, Hong-Bo; Jung, K.; Jung, P.; Kaihotsu, K.; Kajita, T.; Kakizaki, Mitsuru; Kamiizumi, M.; Kanda, Nobuyuki; Kang, G.; Kashiyama, Kazumi; Kawaguchi, Kyohei; Kawai, N.; Kawasaki, T.; Kim, C.; Kim, J.; Kim, J. C.; Kim, W. S.; Kim, Y. M.; Kimura, N.; Kita, Naoki; Kitazawa, H.; Kojima, Yasufumi; Kokeyama, K.; Komori, K.; Kong, Albert; Kotake, Kei; Kozakai, C.; Kozu, R.; Kumar, Rahul; Kume, J.; Kuo, C.; Kuo, H-S.; Kuromiya, Y.; Kuroyanagi, Sachiko; Kusayanagi, K.; Kwak, Kyujin; Lee, H. K.; Lee, H. W.; Lee, R.; Leonardi, M.; Li, K. L.; Li, T. G.F.; Lin, C‐Y.; Lin, F-K.; Lin, F-K.; Lin, H. L.; Lin, L.; Liu, G. C.; Luo, L.-W.; Majorana, E.; Marchio, M.; Michimura, Yuta; Mio, Norikatsu; Miyakawa, O.; Miyamoto, A.; Miyazaki, Yuki; Miyo, K.; Miyoki, S.; Mori, Yuki; Morisaki, S.; Moriwaki, Y.; Nagano, Koji; Nagano, S.; Nakamura, Kouji; Nakano, Hiroyuki; Nakano, Masayuki; Nakashima, Ryosuke; Nakayama, Yoshinori; Narikawa, T.; Naticchioni, L.; Negishi, R.; Quynh, L. Nguyen; Ni, Wei-Tou; Nishizawa, A.; Nozaki, S.; Obuchi, Yasunari; Ogaki, W.; Oh, J. J.; Oh, K.; Oh, Sang Hoon; Ohashi, M.; Ohishi, N.; Ohkawa, Masashi; Ohta, Hiroaki; Okutani, Y.; Okutomi, K.; Oohara, Ken–ichi; Ooi, C.; Oshino, S.; Otabe, S.; Pan, K.; Pang, H.; Parisi, A.; Park, June; Arellano, F. E. Pe na; Pinto, I. M.; Sago, Norichika; Saito, Shinya; Saitō, Yoshio; Sakai, Kazuki; Sakai, Y.; Sakuno, Yuji; Sato, S.; Sato, T.; Sawada, T.; Sekiguchi, T.; Sekiguchi, Y.; Shao, Lijing; Shibagaki, S.; Shimizu, R.; Shimoda, T.; Shimode, K.; Shinkai, H.; Shishido, T.; Shoda, A.; Somiya, K.; Son, E. J.; Sotani, Hajime; Sugimoto, R.; Suresh, J.; Suzuki, Toshikazu; Tagoshi, Hideyuki; Takahashi, Hideya; Takahashi, Ryuichi; Takamori, A.; Takano, S.; Takeda, H.; Takeda, M.; Tanaka, H.; Tanaka, Kazuyuki; Tanaka, Takahiro; Tanioka, S.; Martín, E. N. Tapia San; Telada, S.; Tomaru, T.; Tomigami, Y.; Tomura, T.; Travasso, F.; Trozzo, L.; Tsang, T.; Tsao, Jie-Shiun; Tsubono, K.; Tsuchida, S.; Tsuna, D.; Tsutsui, T.; Tsuzuki, Toshihiro; Tuyenbayev, D.; Uchikata, N.; Uchiyama, Takashi; Ueda, A.; Uehara, T.; Ueno, K.; Ueshima, G.; Uraguchi, Fumihiro; Ushiba, T.; Putten, Maurice H. P. M. van; Vocca, H.; Wang, J.; Washimi, T.; Wu, C.; Wu, H.; Wu, S.; Xu, W-R.; Yamada, Tomohiro; Yamamoto, Kohei; Yamamoto, Takahiro; Yamashita, Kazuya; Yamazaki, Ryo; Yang, Yi; Yokogawa, K.; Yokoyama, Jun′ichi; Yokozawa, T.; Yoshioka, T.; Yuzurihara, H.; Zeidler, S.; Zhan, Min; Zhang, H.; Zhao, Yuhang; Zhu, Zong-Hong

doi:10.1093/ptep/ptaa120

Cited by 54 publications

(28 citation statements)

References 463 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…One well-motivated model (Ac3G) approximates with three Gaussian functions the results of numerical simulations of a SN collapsing to a neutron star, and the other model (LAc3G) assumes a longer accretion phase, as could be appropriate for the collapse of a higher-mass star to a black hole. 2 We do not discuss the possibilities for GW emissions in the subsequent cooling phase, which have not yet been studied numerically. See also [48] for a suggestion to search for GW emission from ultra-relativistic jets that could be generated by some core-collapse SNe.…”

Section: (B) Supernovaementioning

confidence: 99%

“…The other is the gravitational memory effect due to asymmetric neutrino emission during the accretion phase following the collapse [47], which is expected to peak in a frequency range approximately 1 Hz, and hence is of interest to AION and AEDGE. 2 This effect has recently been studied numerically in [49], using phenomenological models inspired by numerical simulations. These models reproduce typical features of the neutrino luminosity and of the anisotropy in the neutrino emission over time scales 0.1 s, during the accretion phase that follows the initial neutronization phase.…”

Section: (B) Supernovaementioning

confidence: 99%

“…If so, do they originate from previous mergers, or some primordial mechanism, or are they made possible by some new physics beyond the Standard Model? These are among the many questions to be studied in future data from LIGO and Virgo, which have now been joined by KAGRA [2], with LIGO-India [3] joining in the future. Other laser interferometer projects operating in a similar frequency range, such as the Einstein Telescope (ET) [4] and Cosmic explorer (CE) [5], are also being planned.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Prospective sensitivities of atom interferometers to gravitational waves and ultralight dark matter

Badurina

Buchmueller

Ellis

et al. 2021

Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We survey the prospective sensitivities of terrestrial and space-borne atom interferometers to gravitational waves generated by cosmological and astrophysical sources, and to ultralight dark matter. We discuss the backgrounds from gravitational gradient noise in terrestrial detectors, and also binary pulsar and asteroid backgrounds in space-borne detectors. We compare the sensitivities of LIGO and LISA with those of the 100 m and 1 km stages of the AION terrestrial AI project, as well as two options for the proposed AEDGE AI space mission with cold atom clouds either inside or outside the spacecraft, considering as possible sources the mergers of black holes and neutron stars, supernovae, phase transitions in the early Universe, cosmic strings and quantum fluctuations in the early Universe that could have generated primordial black holes. We also review the capabilities of AION and AEDGE for detecting coherent waves of ultralight scalar dark matter. AION-REPORT/2021-04 KCL-PH-TH/2021-61, CERN-TH-2021-116 This article is part of the theme issue ‘Quantum technologies in particle physics’.

show abstract

Section: (B) Supernovaementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: (B) Supernovaementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Prospective sensitivities of atom interferometers to gravitational waves and ultralight dark matter

Badurina

Buchmueller

Ellis

et al. 2021

Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…After the Advanced Virgo joined the GW observation network, the extra polarization modes have been tested with GW170814 [14]. The KAGRA in Japan has begun operating and will improve the measurement of polarizations in the near future [15][16][17][18][19].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Observing gravitational wave polarizations with LISA-TAIJI network

Wang,

Han

2021

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Two polarization modes of gravitational wave are derived from the general relativity which are plus and cross modes. However, the alternative theories of gravity can yield the gravitational wave with up to six polarizations. Searching for the polarizations beyond plus and cross is an important test of general relativity. In principle, one space-borne detector, like LISA, could measure the gravitational wave polarizations from a long time observation with its orbital motion. With the comparable sensitivities, the joint LISA and TAIJI missions will improve the observations on the polarization predictions of theories beyond general relativity. In this work, a class of parameterized post-Einsteinian waveform is employed to describe the alternative polarizations, and six parameterized post-Einsteinian parameters quantifying from general relativity waveform are examined by using the LISA-TAIJI network. Our results show that the measurements on amplitudes of alternative polarizations from joint LISA-TAIJI observation could be improved by more than 10 times compared to LISA single mission in an optimal scenario.

show abstract

“…The historic discovery of gravitational waves from multiple types of compact object mergers by the LIGO/VIRGO collaborations [1][2][3][4] has opened a new window into the Universe. These instruments, along with the newly commissioned KAGRA [5], are sensitive to gravitational waves in the frequency band above 10 Hz. Much like in electromagnetism, there is an exceptionally strong case to probe other parts of the gravitational wave spectrum, since it is likely that the Universe has interesting secrets across this spectrum.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Gravity Gradient Noise from Asteroids

Fedderke,

Graham,

Rajendran

2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The gravitational coupling of nearby massive bodies to test masses in a gravitational wave (GW) detector cannot be shielded, and gives rise to 'gravity gradient noise' (GGN) in the detector. In this paper we show that for any GW detector using local test masses in the Inner Solar System, the GGN from the motion of the field of ∼ 10 5 Inner Solar System asteroids presents an irreducible noise floor for the detection of GW that rises exponentially at low frequencies. This severely limits prospects for GW detection using local test masses for frequencies fgw (few) × 10 −7 Hz. At higher frequencies, we find that the asteroid GGN falls rapidly enough that detection may be possible; however, the incompleteness of existing asteroid catalogs with regard to small bodies makes this an open question around fgw ∼ µHz, and further study is warranted. We show that a detector network placed in the Outer Solar System would not be overwhelmed by this noise above ∼ 10 nHz, and also discuss the prospects for using astrometric measurements of a field of distant stars to overcome the limitations of local test masses for GW detection in the ∼ 10 nHz-µHz band.

show abstract

Overview of KAGRA: KAGRA science

Cited by 54 publications

References 463 publications

Prospective sensitivities of atom interferometers to gravitational waves and ultralight dark matter

Prospective sensitivities of atom interferometers to gravitational waves and ultralight dark matter

Observing gravitational wave polarizations with LISA-TAIJI network

Gravity Gradient Noise from Asteroids

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About