Rough Sets and Knowledge Technology
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-72458-2_25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overview of Kansei System and Related Problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This section distills the essence of my interpretation of the HCI models and theories as presented in this article and used in an operational context in the case studies of earlier publications (Lehane, 2008(Lehane, , 2012bLehane & Huf, 2006, 2007. Humans mediate their activities with tools.…”
Section: Community Of Practice Interaction Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This section distills the essence of my interpretation of the HCI models and theories as presented in this article and used in an operational context in the case studies of earlier publications (Lehane, 2008(Lehane, , 2012bLehane & Huf, 2006, 2007. Humans mediate their activities with tools.…”
Section: Community Of Practice Interaction Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that the artifacts and their cognitive and physical affordances, including their location on the screen, should be drawn from the praxis of the largest subset of users in the community of practice. To design with this in mind means that the majority of users are already familiar with the artifacts and how to use them (Lehane & Huf, 2006, 2007. By design then, the activity praxis is distributed over time, location, and people: This leveraging of prior knowledge is a contextual example of distributed cognition.…”
Section: Affordance In Intuitive Use Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To represent the theoretical base of this article, additional operational detail was incorporated into the Engeström diagram (see Figure 3). This was achieved by positioning the individual's response in the model as an orientation activity between object and outcome: Orientation locates the subject's consciousness as the affective, cognitive, and physical responses with and in the context of the object-outcome transformation process (Checkland, 1999;Norman, 2004;Preece et al, 2007;Shiizuka, 2007).…”
Section: Activity Theory Operationalizedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the field of Kansei engineering, Shiizuka [3] introduced a framework of Kansei system and proposed guiding principles for researches of artificial Kansei. In the framework, it is said to be the most important thing that a system can properly respond to individual situations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%