2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-44564-9_27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overview of NewsREEL’16: Multi-dimensional Evaluation of Real-Time Stream-Recommendation Algorithms

Abstract: Abstract. Successful news recommendation requires facing the challenges of dynamic item sets, contextual item relevance, and of fulfilling non-functional requirements, such as response time. The CLEF NewsREEL challenge is a campaignstyle evaluation lab allowing participants to tackle news recommendation and to optimize and evaluate their recommender algorithms both online and offline. In this paper, we summarize the objectives and challenges of NewsREEL 2016. We cover two contrasting perspectives on the challe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2013, plista released a data set specifically for news recommender systems [14]. Subsequently, multiple updates of the data set have been released in scope of CLEF NewsREEL [13,18,15]. Li et al [19] model news recommendation as contextual bandit problem.…”
Section: Evaluation Of News Recommendation Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2013, plista released a data set specifically for news recommender systems [14]. Subsequently, multiple updates of the data set have been released in scope of CLEF NewsREEL [13,18,15]. Li et al [19] model news recommendation as contextual bandit problem.…”
Section: Evaluation Of News Recommendation Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Living labs are available in information retrieval and for many recommender-system domains, particularly news [4][5][6], and they attracted dedicated workshops [7]. There is also work on living labs in the context of search and browsing behavior in digital libraries [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%