2011
DOI: 10.1088/0029-5515/51/9/094013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overview of physics results from MAST

Abstract: Several improvements to the MAST plant and diagnostics have facilitated new studies advancing the physics basis for ITER and DEMO, as well as for future spherical tokamaks. Using the increased heating capabilities P NBI ≤ 3.8 MW H-mode at I p = 1.2 MA was accessed showing that the energy confinement on MAST scales more weakly with I p and more strongly with B t than in the ITER IPB98(y,2) scaling. Measurements of the fuel retention of shallow pellets extrapolate to an ITER particle throughput of 70% of its ori… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
2
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This scaling has been reported in several tokamaks including DIII-D, C-Mod, and the MAST ST [63], but the best fit to the NSTX data indicates a significantly stronger scaling, closer to linear in β ped p (figure 9) [64]. Also, although past analysis using KBM constraints in the ballooning critical pedestal model [62] have yielded a (β has stronger shaping than MAST, and that MAST research claims that the plasmas are ballooning mode-limited [65] as opposed to NSTX which is computed to be peeling modelimited.…”
Section: Pedestal Width Scaling and Elm Stability Calculationssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…This scaling has been reported in several tokamaks including DIII-D, C-Mod, and the MAST ST [63], but the best fit to the NSTX data indicates a significantly stronger scaling, closer to linear in β ped p (figure 9) [64]. Also, although past analysis using KBM constraints in the ballooning critical pedestal model [62] have yielded a (β has stronger shaping than MAST, and that MAST research claims that the plasmas are ballooning mode-limited [65] as opposed to NSTX which is computed to be peeling modelimited.…”
Section: Pedestal Width Scaling and Elm Stability Calculationssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The first discharges studied were in a double-null configuration with plasma current, I p = 900 kA at two neutral beam heating powers, P NBI = 1.5 MW and P NBI = 3.4 MW [16]. The discharge with P NBI = 1.5 MW has regular type III ELMs and the T i data are extracted from the inter-ELM periods of the discharge.…”
Section: Target Ion Temperature Measurements In H-modementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar shaped double-null discharge with a lower plasma current, I p = 600 kA, with beam heating, P NBI = 3.4 MW, and regular type I ELMs has been studied [16]. The RFEA data has been extracted from inter-ELM periods in the discharge.…”
Section: Target Ion Temperature Measurements In H-modementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3 In this paper, the results of inter-ELM and ELM T i measurements made on MAST [11] using a RFEA mounted on a reciprocating probe at the midplane will be presented. In section 2, a brief introduction to RFEAs is given along with a description of the plasma conditions used.…”
Section: P3-82mentioning
confidence: 99%