2012
DOI: 10.17487/rfc6627
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overview of Pre-Congestion Notification Encoding

Abstract: The objective of Pre-Congestion Notification (PCN) is to protect the quality of service (QoS) of inelastic flows within a Diffserv domain. On every link in the PCN-domain, the overall rate of PCN-traffic is metered, and PCN-packets are appropriately marked when certain configured rates are exceeded. Egress nodes provide decision points with information about the PCN-marks of PCN-packets that allows them to take decisions about whether to admit or block a new flow request, and to terminate some already admitted… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The PCN Working Group currently standardized PCN's metering and marking behaviour [4] as well as a first encoding scheme for marked packets [24]. Several encoding alternatives have been defined [25,26] as well as different possible behaviours at the edge of the PCN domain [27,28]. For more information about PCN's performance and a survey of PCN's algorithms we refer to [29,30].…”
Section: Admission Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PCN Working Group currently standardized PCN's metering and marking behaviour [4] as well as a first encoding scheme for marked packets [24]. Several encoding alternatives have been defined [25,26] as well as different possible behaviours at the edge of the PCN domain [27,28]. For more information about PCN's performance and a survey of PCN's algorithms we refer to [29,30].…”
Section: Admission Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The publication of RFC 6040 removed the tunnelling constraints that existed when the encoding of [RFC5696] was written (see Section 3.3.2 of [RFC6627]). …”
Section: Requirements Imposed By Tunnellingmentioning
confidence: 99%