2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2013.03.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overview of the 2006 eruption of Mt. Merapi

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Andreastuti et al 2000;Newhall et al 2000;Voight et al 2000;Gertisser et al 2012a;Surono et al 2012). The previous eruption in 2006 is a well-characterised extrusive, dome-forming eruption at Merapi (Charbonnier and Gertisser 2008;Gertisser et al 2012b;Preece et al 2013;Ratdomopurbo et al 2013). Although the 2006 eruption displayed typical Merapi dome-forming activity, peak dome extrusion rates reached 3.3 m 3 s −1 , which is high compared to other recent Merapi eruptions.…”
Section: The 2010 and 2006 Eruptions Of Merapimentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Andreastuti et al 2000;Newhall et al 2000;Voight et al 2000;Gertisser et al 2012a;Surono et al 2012). The previous eruption in 2006 is a well-characterised extrusive, dome-forming eruption at Merapi (Charbonnier and Gertisser 2008;Gertisser et al 2012b;Preece et al 2013;Ratdomopurbo et al 2013). Although the 2006 eruption displayed typical Merapi dome-forming activity, peak dome extrusion rates reached 3.3 m 3 s −1 , which is high compared to other recent Merapi eruptions.…”
Section: The 2010 and 2006 Eruptions Of Merapimentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Surono et al 2012). In contrast to recent prolonged and effusive dome-forming eruptions at Merapi, such as the previous eruption in 2006 (Charbonnier and Gertisser 2008;Preece et al 2013;Ratdomopurbo et al 2013), the 2010 eruption began explosively and a new lava dome grew in the newly formed crater prior to explosive destruction of this dome during the peak of the eruption on 5 November 2010, followed by further explosive activity and extrusion of a new dome after 5 November (Surono et al 2012;Komorowski et al 2013;Pallister et al 2013) (Fig. 1).…”
Section: The 2010 and 2006 Eruptions Of Merapimentioning
confidence: 89%
“…) when dome growth took place subsequently (Surono et al 2012;Pallister et al 2013;Ratdomopurbo et al 2013). Activity in 2010 included several explosive stages generating a series of laterally directed dome explosions ('blasts'), a subplinian eruption column and maximum PDC runout distances of ∼16 km, more than twice those generated in the effusive dome-forming eruption in 2006 (Charbonnier and Gertisser 2008;Charbonnier et al 2013;Komorowski et al 2013).…”
Section: Eruption Chronology Deposits and Sampling Eruption Chronologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At some volcanoes, the timing and dimension of extrusive activity may be forecasted based on precursory signals such as earthquakes, tremors and long periodic seismicity (Kilburn and Voight, 1998;Neuberg, 2000;Bean et al, 2014), as well as ground displacements on different scales (Surono et al, 2012;Di Traglia et al, 2013) that can be readily identified and have been successfully used for timely evacuation. A large variety of conduit processes may generate precursory signals, including gas accumulation beneath a volcanic dome (Johnson et al, 2008), episodic slip on the conduit margins (Anderson et al, 2010), changes in a dynamic plumbing system (Kahl et al, 2011) or the accumulation of magmatic material at shallow levels (Ratdomopurbo et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some cases, we can observe summit deformation caused by the pre-eruptive intrusion of magma to very shallow levels of the volcano (Dzurisin et al, 2008;Saepuloh et al, 2013). Since the newly injected material remains there, this deformation is static and lacks co-explosive subsidence (Ratdomopurbo et al, 2013). However, short term pre-eruptive deformation originating from conduit processes of smaller magnitude are rarely detected with geodetic instrumentation, yet may be related to a considerable proportion of pre-eruptive seismic signals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%