2013
DOI: 10.1002/jgrd.50398
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overview of the 2009 and 2011 Sayarim Infrasound Calibration Experiments

Abstract: Three large‐scale infrasound calibration experiments were conducted in 2009 and 2011 to test the International Monitoring System (IMS) infrasound network and provide ground truth data for infrasound propagation studies. Here we provide an overview of the deployment, detonation, atmospheric specifications, infrasound array observations, and propagation modeling for the experiments. The experiments at the Sayarim Military Range, Israel, had equivalent TNT yields of 96.0, 7.4, and 76.8 t of explosives on 26 Augus… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3d, winds only). Although HWM07 is more like a climatology without any year-to-year variation, some studies use it as representation of mean or background wind fields, even for single case studies, (e.g., Assink et al, 2012;Hedlin and Walker, 2012;Fee et al, 2013). However, HWM07 describes the actual winds inadequately: the zonal wind is too weak in the upper stratosphere (compared to ECMWF) and too strong in the upper mesosphere (compared to lidar), with differences up to 20 m s −1 ; in between, mean zonal wind matches quite well.…”
Section: Comparison To Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3d, winds only). Although HWM07 is more like a climatology without any year-to-year variation, some studies use it as representation of mean or background wind fields, even for single case studies, (e.g., Assink et al, 2012;Hedlin and Walker, 2012;Fee et al, 2013). However, HWM07 describes the actual winds inadequately: the zonal wind is too weak in the upper stratosphere (compared to ECMWF) and too strong in the upper mesosphere (compared to lidar), with differences up to 20 m s −1 ; in between, mean zonal wind matches quite well.…”
Section: Comparison To Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Long-range ground-to-ground infrasound propagation is most efficient in the stratosphere [Fee et al, 2013], as the absorption in this waveguide is relatively small [Sutherland and Bass, 2004]. However, a sufficiently strong stratospheric circumpolar vortex in the direction of propagation is required to trap infrasound in the stratosphere.…”
Section: Passive Acoustic Remote Sensingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, note that differences between ECMWF and G2S are most significant above 50 km. A similar observation was made by Fee et al [].…”
Section: Propagation Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%