2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.paerosci.2004.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overview of the abrupt wing stall program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This aircraft, in its pre-production version, experienced abrupt wing stall which resulted in its susceptibility to asymmetric wing stall, or wing drop. 24 Because of the abrupt wing stall of pre-production aircraft, this version makes a good test bed for code comparisons and will be used for the current investigation. The wing drop on the pre-production aircraft was eliminated by modifying the leading-edge flap schedule and adding a porous surface over the wing-fold fairing.…”
Section: B Naval Air Systems Command (Navair)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This aircraft, in its pre-production version, experienced abrupt wing stall which resulted in its susceptibility to asymmetric wing stall, or wing drop. 24 Because of the abrupt wing stall of pre-production aircraft, this version makes a good test bed for code comparisons and will be used for the current investigation. The wing drop on the pre-production aircraft was eliminated by modifying the leading-edge flap schedule and adding a porous surface over the wing-fold fairing.…”
Section: B Naval Air Systems Command (Navair)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third type is the generic aircraft configuration (Brandon & Nguyen, 1988; Ericsson, Mendenhall, & Perkins, 1996; Ma, Deng, Rong, & Wang, 2015; Ma, Wang, & Deng, 2017; Shi, Deng, Wang, Li, & Tian, 2015), and a pair of forebody leeward vortices is the main feature of its flow field. Besides the above simplified models, many actual aircraft have also been reported to exhibit the wing rock phenomenon in wind tunnel experiments or flight tests, such as the HP 115 (Ross, 1972), F-4, F-5, F-14, Gnat, Harrier (Hsu & Lan, 1985), X-29, X-31 (Ericsson et al., 1996), AV-8B (Hall, Woodson, & Chambers, 2004), F/A-18E fighter (Owens, Bryant, & Barlow, 2006), F-35 fighter (Owens, McConnell, Brandon, & Hall, 2006), a canard-configuration aircraft (Wei, Shi, Geng, & Ang, 2017) and a generic fighter aircraft with a conical forebody (Chung, Cho, Kim, & Jang, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complex nature of the coefficients and the possibility of spin generally lead to a requirement for extensive wind tunnel and flight testing (Hall et al 2004) to verify the behaviour of the aircraft in a heavy stall (Heinz 2020). Recent developments of advanced numerical methods, such as Detached Eddy Simulation (DES) and unsteady RANS methods (Zhou et al 2019a;Zhou et al 2019b), now offer the opportunity to predict these complex aerodynamic behaviours with greater fidelity (Wang and Fu 2017;Casadei et al 2019;Neves et al 2020), supplementing the existing experimental data and providing design fixes, ahead of the flight testing program.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%