Review of Science 2019
DOI: 10.26220/rev.3140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overview of the Computer Programming Learning Environments for primary education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data that emerged from the systematic literature review were classified based on the categorization proposed by Fessakis et al (2019). A programming environment should be based on pedagogical and didactic criteria in preschool and primary education.…”
Section: Data Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The data that emerged from the systematic literature review were classified based on the categorization proposed by Fessakis et al (2019). A programming environment should be based on pedagogical and didactic criteria in preschool and primary education.…”
Section: Data Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a programming environment should be developmentally appropriate, support the solution of a problem creatively and offer opportunities for digital expression. In addition, a good selection of a programming environment depends on how well its programming model facilitates learning, designing learning activities and making the problem area accessible (Fessakis et al, 2019). Given the preceding, the classification proposed by the researchers was based on five axes: the axis related to the abstraction levels of the computational system, the axis of age suitability, the axis of the supported programming model, the axis of the abstract approach to the programming process and the axis of the supported methods used in programming languages.…”
Section: Data Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations