EVALITA. Evaluation of NLP and Speech Tools for Italian 2016
DOI: 10.4000/books.aaccademia.1992
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overview of the Evalita 2016 SENTIment POLarity Classification Task

Abstract: Pubblicazione resa disponibile nei termini della licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione -Non commerciale -Non opere derivate 4.0

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
91
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
91
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Emotion awareness in software engineering is receiving increasing attention as part of human factors of software engineering 2 . As such, a recent research trend has emerged to study developers' emotions as they are shared and conveyed in the communication channels within collaborative development environments, including issue tracking systems (e.g., Jira) [22] [27], software repository forges (e.g., GitHub) [15][31] [38], and technical Q&A sites (e.g., Stack Overflow) [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emotion awareness in software engineering is receiving increasing attention as part of human factors of software engineering 2 . As such, a recent research trend has emerged to study developers' emotions as they are shared and conveyed in the communication channels within collaborative development environments, including issue tracking systems (e.g., Jira) [22] [27], software repository forges (e.g., GitHub) [15][31] [38], and technical Q&A sites (e.g., Stack Overflow) [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The French and Italian parts of the annotated corpus have been respectively exploited as datasets for the first irony detection shared tasks DEFT@TALN2017 7 and for the SENTIPOLC@Evalita shared task on irony detection 8 in both 2014 and 2016 editions (Basile et al, 2014;Barbieri et al, 2016). In particular, currently only the first layer of the annotation scheme has been exploited aiming at detecting if a given tweet is ironic or not.…”
Section: Exploiting the Annotated Corpus For Automatic Irony Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our system is evaluated on the SENTIPOLC official test data composed of 3000 tweets and the values of precision, recall and average F-score are calculated using the evaluation tool provided by the organizers (Barbieri et al, 2016). As we can see from Table 3, official results of our system are promising, although our research in this domain has to be improved.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%