2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-67194-5_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overview of the HECKTOR Challenge at MICCAI 2020: Automatic Head and Neck Tumor Segmentation in PET/CT

Abstract: This paper presents an overview of the second edition of the HEad and neCK TumOR (HECKTOR) challenge, organized as a satellite event of the 24th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI) 2021. The challenge is composed of three tasks related to the automatic analysis of PET/CT images for patients with Head and Neck cancer (H&N), focusing on the oropharynx region. Task 1 is the automatic segmentation of H&N primary Gross Tumor Volume (GTVt) in FDG-PET/CT ima… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
77
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
2
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, there has been increasing evidence suggesting the utility of applying deep learning for fully-automated OPC tumor auto-segmentation in various imaging modalities [14,[20][21][22]. PET-CT has recently shown excellent performance when used as inputs to deep learning models, partly due to the large and highly curated datasets provided by the HECKTOR Challenge [8]. While direct comparison of performance metrics between segmentation studies is often ill-advised, the HECKTOR Challenge offers a systematic method for directly compare segmentation methods with each other.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In recent years, there has been increasing evidence suggesting the utility of applying deep learning for fully-automated OPC tumor auto-segmentation in various imaging modalities [14,[20][21][22]. PET-CT has recently shown excellent performance when used as inputs to deep learning models, partly due to the large and highly curated datasets provided by the HECKTOR Challenge [8]. While direct comparison of performance metrics between segmentation studies is often ill-advised, the HECKTOR Challenge offers a systematic method for directly compare segmentation methods with each other.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data set used in this study, which was released through AIcrowd [7] for the HECKTOR Challenge at MICCAI 2021 [8], consists of co-registered 18…”
Section: Imaging Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data from 224 HNSCC patients from multiple institutions was provided in the 2021 HECKTOR Challenge [6,7] training set. Data for these patients included co-registered 18 F-FDG PET and CT scans, clinical data (Center ID, Gender, Age, TNM edition, chemotherapy status, TNM group, T-stage, N-stage, and M-stage), and ground truth manual segmentations of primary tumors derived from clinical experts.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leading professional societies [e.g., MICCAI Society, Radiological Society of North America, American Association of Physicists in Medicine, Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI)] often organize international challenges for validation and comparison of competitive medical image analysis algorithms, leading to the creation of rankings and guidelines regarding the performance of these approaches under controlled conditions by using public image repositories (127). Several of these challenges were set up to tackle major issues facing quantitative PET imaging, including MICCAI Society challenges on PET image segmentation (128,129) and PET radiomics analysis (130), and the most recent SNMMI challenge on 177 Lu dosimetry based on quantitative SPECT imaging (131).…”
Section: Issues With Medical Imaging Challenges and Rankings Of Competitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%