2021
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6587/abf540
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overview of the isotope effects in the ASDEX Upgrade tokamak

Abstract: In recent years, measurements on the ASDEX Upgrade tokamak and modelling performed for plasmas with hydrogen (H) and deuterium (D) as the main gas have improved our understanding of the ion mass dependencies in fusion plasmas. The observed isotope effects can be explained with established physics processes which highlight the importance of treating heat transport with coupled electron and ion heat channels. In the core of electron heated L-mode plasmas, the mass dependence of the electron–ion equipartition res… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
7
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in figure 15, in the predictions of the ion temperature, the replacement of hydrogen mass with deuterium mass leads to a small increase of the TGLF ion heat conductivity in the confinement region, by about 10% on average in the present AUG dataset. This weak positive dependence can be still considered to be acceptable in reproducing the AUG experimental observations in these conditions of dominant electron heating, where the experimental power balance ion heat conductivities are observed not to show a strong dependence on mass, consistent with previous studies [47,51]. This behaviour of the TGLF model is also satisfactory in H-mode conditions with comparable ion and electron heating, where the TGLF modelling of H plasmas with H mass only leads to a small overprediction of the ion temperature [46].…”
Section: Isotope Effectssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As shown in figure 15, in the predictions of the ion temperature, the replacement of hydrogen mass with deuterium mass leads to a small increase of the TGLF ion heat conductivity in the confinement region, by about 10% on average in the present AUG dataset. This weak positive dependence can be still considered to be acceptable in reproducing the AUG experimental observations in these conditions of dominant electron heating, where the experimental power balance ion heat conductivities are observed not to show a strong dependence on mass, consistent with previous studies [47,51]. This behaviour of the TGLF model is also satisfactory in H-mode conditions with comparable ion and electron heating, where the TGLF modelling of H plasmas with H mass only leads to a small overprediction of the ion temperature [46].…”
Section: Isotope Effectssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The database contains AUG plasmas in hydrogen as well as in deuterium which allows one to examine the predicted mass dependence in ASTRA-TGLF simulations. Experimentally, isotope effects in ASDEX Upgrade were extensively studied in [47] where several isotope mass dependent mechanisms were identified which can influence the energy confinement. Considering the presence of such a mass dependence in turbulent transport, it is considered to be problematic for ITER PFPO-1 simulations that TGLF is exclusively calibrated on deuterium plasmas although all discharges in PFPO-1 will be performed either in hydrogen or in helium [25].…”
Section: Isotope Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ion heating by thermal equipartition is stronger in H, due to the inverse mass dependence of the thermal exchange term, which was already identified to be the dominant effect which explains differences in core confinement in H and D plasmas in AUG [67]. The TGLF-SAT2 simulation results also point out that the TGLF-SAT2 mass dependence of ion heat transport has properties which more closely follow a gyroBohm dependence, whereas the experiment has a behaviour which is closer to Bohm like [68].…”
Section: Power Scansmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Clear turbulence activity is observed in the inter-ELM periods, which is sometimes interrupted by comparably quiescent behavior. This kind of inter-ELM activity has been observed in AUG H-modes [74,75].…”
Section: H-mode In Favorable Configurationmentioning
confidence: 64%