Overview of the water policy process in South Africa

Abstract

This research article provides an overview of the policy process followed by the South African Government in developing and implementing the White Paper on a National Water Policy for South Africa between 1994 and 2003. The research is based on a report published by the South African Water Research Commission (WRC), which formed part of a project entitled: Consolidation and Transfer of Knowledge and Experience Gained in the Development and Implementation of Water and Related Policy in South Africa (WRC Project number K5/1295). An attempt was made in the research project to solicit lessons of experience from the last ten years and to suggest findings regarding future options. It was found that valuable experience exists that is relevant not only to present and future policy and strategy initiatives in South Africa but also to policy process development in a regional and global context. The review of the water policy process has included a deliberate attempt to apply a selected policy process model to the South African water policy process in order to attempt a systematic analysis of the process. Specific findings were made regarding policy and strategy processes, institutional capacity and policy research in the water sector. The findings of the study included a confirmation of the technical quality of the policy and identification of several opportunities and priorities in the implementation of water policy.

Continuity and Change in Social-ecological Systems: the Role of Institutional Resilience

“…Expressions like "in a phased and progressive manner" allow for the gradual implementation of the Act over both time and space and its adaptation to local circumstances (Rowlston et al 2000). This phased approach was deemed necessary due to the comprehensive changes the Act required and to the limited (human and financial) resources available for its implementation (de Coning 2006). …”

The perceptions of research values and priorities in water resource management from the 3rd Orange River Basin Symposium

“…This would suggest that any gains made by these advanced roadmaps are being undone by a lack of implementation caused, not by external environmental factors (with the possible exception of 'water provisioning'), but by human inefficiency. Water policy reviews (MacKay et al, 2003;De Coning and Sherwill, 2004;De Coning, 2006) repeatedly identify the above-mentioned weaknesses as major limitations of the South African water policy. Reasons for this include the failure to develop implementation options during the water policy formulation stage, inadequate financial resources available for implementation of the policy, and the fact that too few people, with a diverse range of competencies, are available to implement and enforce water legislation (De Coning and Sherwill, 2004).…”

The South African ‘Ecological Reserve’, A Travelling Concept

“…Today the rationale behind the concept is so different from the one carried out by its initiators in the DWA that some water experts talk about the ecological reserve having been 'hijacked' 22 by the aquatic scientists in South Africa. At no point did DWA civil engineers or DWA officials that scientists could take control of the concept foresee it De Coning and Sherwill (2004) mentioned the opening of a window of opportunity in the mid-1990s in discussions over the Water Reform Act. In the period immediately after the Founding Elections in 1994 this window of opportunity would have allowed a fundamental change, irrespective of the policy sector at stake.…”