2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-65558-1_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overview: PCA Models and Issues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 169 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The transition probability of each node is determined by the current status of itself and all of its neighbors’ current status as Eq (3.1) and Eq (3.2) . To formulate such a problem, the model is set up as locally interacting Markov chains, also known as probabilistic cellular automata (PCA) ( Fernández, Louis, & Nardi, 2018 ). The state space of such a model is the tensor product of the statuses of all the local Markov chains, which is huge in our context.…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The transition probability of each node is determined by the current status of itself and all of its neighbors’ current status as Eq (3.1) and Eq (3.2) . To formulate such a problem, the model is set up as locally interacting Markov chains, also known as probabilistic cellular automata (PCA) ( Fernández, Louis, & Nardi, 2018 ). The state space of such a model is the tensor product of the statuses of all the local Markov chains, which is huge in our context.…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This might work for a small sized network, but it will eventually become infeasible when the size or complexity of the network grows ( Garvey & Carnovale, 2020 ). In fact, the area of PCA acknowledges its complexity and suggests that it is used as a flexible modeling, such as agent-based modeling, and simulation framework in an applied context ( Fernández et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The behavior displayed by N → /L and τ(L, α) in Figures 6, 8 and 9 supports this idea. It should be remarked that while the ergodicity of one-dimensional deterministic CA is in general undecidable, most PCA are believed to be ergodic, with the notable exception of Gacs' very complicated (and still controversial) counterexample [22][23][24][50][51][52][53][54]. We established an upper bound on the critical level of noise of GKL-IV above which it becomes ergodic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, for GKL-IV model under noise level α, at every time step the probability of writing the new state to a cell according to the rules is (1 − α) + 1 4 α, while the probability of doing it incorrectly is 3 4 α. A PCA is ergodic if it eventually forgets its initial state, meaning that it has a unique invariant measure-a unique probability distribution of states over the configuration space of the model that does not change under the dynamics [12,[50][51][52][53][54]. Remarkably, GKL found by means of numerical experiments evidence that GKL-IV may be nonergodic below a certain small level of noise α * ≈ 0.05 [2].…”
Section: The Gkl-iv Model Under Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Probabilistic Cellular Automata (PCA) form a class of discrete-time Markov processes on spaces of the form A L , where L is a lattice (typically, L = Z d for some d ≥ 1), and A is a finite set called an alphabet (see e.g. [6] for a seminal reference, and [2] for a recent survey). In the present paper, we consider one-dimensional PCAs, that is, L = Z.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%