1976
DOI: 10.1577/1548-8659(1976)38[73:orocfi]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overwinter Regeneration of Clipped Fins in Fingerling Brook Trout

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1988
1988
1991
1991

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fin regeneration values found in this study indicate that clipped pectoral and anal fins may regenerate to such an extent that these marks are not recognizable if used in long-term studies. Mears (1976b) suggests that removal of the anal fin may not be a reliable marking method for use in studies where fishermen or inexperienced workers are expected to be able to recognize the marks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fin regeneration values found in this study indicate that clipped pectoral and anal fins may regenerate to such an extent that these marks are not recognizable if used in long-term studies. Mears (1976b) suggests that removal of the anal fin may not be a reliable marking method for use in studies where fishermen or inexperienced workers are expected to be able to recognize the marks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fin mutilation as a method of marking has a long history in the Columbia River (Rich 1927). Fins, other than adipose fins, can regenerate (Mears 1976), in some cases at rates as high as 46 to 53 percent in 3 months (Coon&s et al 1990). Increased mortality in fin-clipped fish has been reported as well (Nicola and Cordone 1973 ;Mears and Hatch 1976).…”
Section: Fin Climinqmentioning
confidence: 99%