2002
DOI: 10.1590/s0074-02762002000300015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oviposition Attractancy of Bacterial Culture Filtrates: response of Culex quinquefasciatus

Abstract: Biocontrol agents and oviposition attractants are promising alternate tools/adjuncts for mosquito control. Using oviposition attractants, monitoring of vector populations, especially Aedes species, could be carried out so as to plan control measures, or to attract gravid females to lay eggs at chosen sites and kill the emerging larvae by combining a larvicide. Microorganisms inhabiting mosquitobreeding sites (Androsov et al. 1986) play a major role in the decomposition of detritus present in the habitats leadi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rockett (1987) screened a variety of bacterial strains against gravid Culex quinquefasciatus and noted that more eggs were laid in water containing Enterobacter agglomerans, Pseudomonas maltophilia or Bacillus cereus than in water without bacteria (control). Poonam et al (2002) tested culture filtrates of several bacterial species for their attractive properties against gravid females of Culex quinquefasciatus and showed that the culture filtrates of Bacillus cereus, Bacillus thuringiensis and Pseudomonas fluorescens exhibited oviposition stimulation. In binary choice assays, Ponnusamy et al (2008) demonstrated that microorganisms in leaf infusions produced oviposition-stimulating kairomones, but also that bacteriaassociated carboxylic acids and methyl esters serve as potent oviposition stimulants for gravid Aedes aegypti.…”
Section: Culicidaementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rockett (1987) screened a variety of bacterial strains against gravid Culex quinquefasciatus and noted that more eggs were laid in water containing Enterobacter agglomerans, Pseudomonas maltophilia or Bacillus cereus than in water without bacteria (control). Poonam et al (2002) tested culture filtrates of several bacterial species for their attractive properties against gravid females of Culex quinquefasciatus and showed that the culture filtrates of Bacillus cereus, Bacillus thuringiensis and Pseudomonas fluorescens exhibited oviposition stimulation. In binary choice assays, Ponnusamy et al (2008) demonstrated that microorganisms in leaf infusions produced oviposition-stimulating kairomones, but also that bacteriaassociated carboxylic acids and methyl esters serve as potent oviposition stimulants for gravid Aedes aegypti.…”
Section: Culicidaementioning
confidence: 99%
“…aegypti L. (Hazard et al, 1967) and Cx. quinquefasciatus Say (Millar et al, 1992;Poonam et al, 2002). In certain cases, bacterial metabolites (Ikeshoji et al, 1975) were thought to be precursors in the synthesis of the volatile attractants.…”
Section: Assays With Cultured Bacteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…: 0.8 mg ml À1 in (Yokoyama and Carlson, 1981) A total amount of 0.005-0.02 mg ml À1 used to attract mosquitoes (Culex quinquefasciatus) for oviposition (Poonam et al, 2002) b Benzoic acid Cochliomyia, Chrysomya (Hilker and Meiners, 2002) NA Swormlure-2: 41 mg ml À1 (Urech et al, 2004) Butyric acid Cochliomyia (Broce, 1980) Pig cecal bacteria: 0.053-1.057 mg ml À1 (Kobayashi and Sakata, 2006) A total amount of 0.02 mg ml À1 used as a synthetic fly attractant for Fannia femoralis (Mulla et al, 1984) Phenol Cochliomyia, Chrysomya (Hilker and Meiners, 2002) Marine bacteria: 0.1-1 mg ml À1 (Updegraff, 1949) Swormlure-2: 41 mg ml À1 used in (Urech et al, 2004) Abbreviation: NA, not applicable. a…”
Section: P Mirabilis Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%