1979
DOI: 10.1093/ee/8.6.1111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oviposition Attractants and Repellents of Mosquitoes: Oviposition Responses of Culex1 Mosquitoes to Organic Infusions 2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
133
0
1

Year Published

1980
1980
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 194 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
133
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…After 24 h, the number of eggs laid in treated and control bowls were counted under a stereomicroscope (Olympus, Japan). The effective attractiveness (EA %) for each oviposition concentration was calculated [24] and the oviposition active index (OAI) was assessed [25].…”
Section: Oviposition Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After 24 h, the number of eggs laid in treated and control bowls were counted under a stereomicroscope (Olympus, Japan). The effective attractiveness (EA %) for each oviposition concentration was calculated [24] and the oviposition active index (OAI) was assessed [25].…”
Section: Oviposition Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where N t =total number of eggs in the test solution, and Ns= total number of eggs in the control solution (Kramer and Mulla 1979). The oviposition active indices of +0.3 and above are considered as attractants, while those with −0.3 and below are considered as repellents (Govindarajan et al 2011).…”
Section: Ovicidal Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…gambiae towards volatile components of water samples from Tanzanian breeding sites. The origin of stimulants in mosquito breeding sites and their mode of action towards gravid females are not fully understood, though it has been suggestively linked to microbial activity (Ikeshoji et al, 1975;Kramer and Mulla, 1979;Benzon and Apperson, 1988;Takken and Knols, 1999;Gimnig et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%