Lecture Notes in Computer Science
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-68123-6_66
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

OWL-S Atomic Services Composition with SWRL Rules

Abstract: Abstract. This paper presents a method for encoding OWL-S atomic processes by means of SWRL rules and composing them using a backward search planning algorithm. A description of the preliminary prototype implementation is also presented.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The later two include possibilities to semantically describe the capabilities and requirements of services by the use of rule languages (e.g., KIF [6] and SWRL [11]). The other component consists of matching and composition, which can be performed both statically [23] and dynamically [12]. Composition techniques can be used to determine subtask decompositions for a given interpretation task.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The later two include possibilities to semantically describe the capabilities and requirements of services by the use of rule languages (e.g., KIF [6] and SWRL [11]). The other component consists of matching and composition, which can be performed both statically [23] and dynamically [12]. Composition techniques can be used to determine subtask decompositions for a given interpretation task.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is based on the method presented in [15], which discusses this in more detail. Then we define relevant predicates using the rules to express the composite Web services state.…”
Section: B Owl-smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rule based descriptions such as the Semantic Web Rule Language (SWRL) (2004) can be added to ontology languages like OWL-S to elucidate further the orchestration of business processes. For example, each OWL-S process (OWL-S, 2004) is based upon an Input Output Process Result (IOPR) model (Redavid et al, 2007). The inputs represent the information required to execute a process and the outputs are the result.…”
Section: Contemporary Web Service Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%