Owner-Level Taxes and Business Activity

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Abstract: In some classes of models, taxes at the owner level are "neutral" and have no effect on firm activity. However, this tax neutrality is sensitive to assumptions and no longer holds in more complex models. We review recent research that incorporates greater complexity in studying the link between taxes and business activity -particularly entrepreneurship. Terms of use: Documents inDividend taxes on owners of large firms affect firm activity in models that include agency conflicts between owners and managers. Similarly, after incorporating entrepreneurs' occupational choice into the model, taxes are no longer neutral. By forsaking lucrative alternative careers, skilled entrepreneurs tend to have high opportunity costs, which make the choice of attempting to start a business of first order importance. Moreover, in models where it is assumed that capital flows across borders without cost, taxes on domestic business owners do not alter business activity because foreign capital seamlessly compensates for tax-induced declines in investments. This theoretical notion is contradicted by the strong "home bias" observed in business ownership, in particular for small firms and startups without easy access to international capital markets.Recent empirical work has emphasized that taxes have heterogeneous effects on mature firms, entrepreneurial startups, and owner-managed small firms. Lowering dividend taxes on firms with dispersed ownership has been shown to shift capital from mature firms into rapidly growing firms. Moreover, capital gains taxation tends to reduce the number of innovative startups and diminish venture capital activity, while high owner-level taxes encourage small business activity and nonentrepreneurial self-employment because such firms have more opportunities to avoid or evade taxes.To obtain efficient incentives in entrepreneurial startups, contractual terms are required that ex ante guarantee that all providers of critical inputs, especially equity constrained entrepreneurs, are entitled to a share of the resulting capital value firm. Unless properly designed, owner-level taxes prevent such ex ante contracting and thus lower the likelihood of eventual success.

Stock option taxation: a missing piece in European innovation policy?

“…Perhaps most importantly, the existence of favorable tax treatment for the entrepreneur and other employees with employee stock options shifts talent to the innovative entrepreneurial sector. Recent research has shown that the effect of owner-level taxes on occupational choice is of first-order importance (Henrekson and Sanandaji 2016). Potentially successful entrepreneurs are rare and tend to have well-paid jobs and career opportunities in incumbent firms.…”

The Entrepreneurial Society

“…The complex interactions among these taxes shape incentives. To disentangle these effects, we begin by focusing on the three main theoretical ways in which the tax system affects entrepreneurial activity (Henrekson and Sanandaji 2016).…”

“…Higher levels of private wealth accumulation could remedy this problem of asymmetric information (Nykvist 2008;Parker 2018) or even enable the entrepreneur to make equity infusions that are large enough to capitalize the firm at inception. Such capitalization is essential for later venture success and performance (Henrekson and Sanandaji 2016).…”

The collaborative innovation bloc: A new mission for Austrian economics

“…This insight is highly relevant for the European Union, where the formal VC industry is modest in size compared to its U.S. counterpart (Lerner and Tåg 2013;Da Rin et al 2006). Possibly as a consequence, U.S. firms grow faster than their European counterparts, which are more likely to remain small (Scarpetta et al 2002;Henrekson and Sanandaji 2016).…”