Owners’ Perception towards Sustainable Housing Affordability in Kuching, Sarawak

Said, Rosli; Daud, Nasir; Esha, Zulkifli; Majid, Rohayu Ab; Najib, Muhammad

doi:10.22452/jdbe.sp2017no1.16

Cited by 12 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The contributions of MCDM methods for the achievement of SDGs belonging to this category are highlighted in 56 studies, as follows: SDG 2-"Zero Hunger and Sustainable Agriculture" [106][107][108][109][110][111][112][113][114][115][116], SDG 3-"Good Health and Well-being" [117][118][119][120][121][122][123], SDG 4-"Inclusive and Quality Education" [124][125][126][127][128], SDG 7-"Affordable and Clean Energy" , and SDG 11-"Sustainable Cities and Communities" [153][154][155][156][157][158][159][160][161]. 4.4.1.…”

Section: Society: Sdg 2 Sdg 3 Sdg 4 Sdg 7 and Sdg 11mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A summary of the MCDM research concerning SDG 11 [153][154][155][156][157][158][159][160][161] is presented in Table 15. Concerning sustainable urban construction problems, two articles integrated the AHP method with other methods and used sensitivity analysis [157,160].…”

Section: Sdg 11: Sustainable Cities and Communitiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Four articles are centered on investigating other problems in urban areas. Said et al [153] ranked alternatives for dealing with housing affordability. Zinatizadeh et al [154] focused on assessing and predict urban sustainability in different areas.…”

Section: Sdg 11: Sustainable Cities and Communitiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…As depicted in Table 15, four studies employed compromise methods, as follows (i) COPRAS [153], (ii) TOPSIS [154,157], (iii) SAW and IFPPSI [154], and (iv) IOWA [161]. The remaining studies applied outranking methods (PROMETHEE and ELECTRE [154,161] and the multi-objective ZOGP [159] For the achievement of SDGs belonging to this category, several applications of MCDM methods reported in 36 studies are presented and discussed here, as follows: SDG 6-"Clean Water and Sanitation" [162][163][164][165][166][167][168], SDG 13-"Climate Action" [169][170][171][172][173][174][175][176][177][178][179][180][181][182], SDG 14-"Life below Water" [183][184][185][186][187][188], and SDG 15-"Life on Land" [189][190][191][192][193][194][195][196][197].…”

Section: Sdg 11: Sustainable Cities and Communitiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Multiple Criteria Decision Making for the Achievement of the UN Sustainable Development Goals: A Systematic Literature Review and a Research Agenda

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Multiple-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods have been widely employed in various fields and disciplines, including decision problems regarding Sustainable Development (SD) issues. The main objective of this paper is to present a systematic literature review (SLR) on MCDM methods supporting decisions focusing on the achievement of UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development in regional, national, or local contexts. In this regard, 143 published scientific articles from 2016 to 2020 were retrieved from the Scopus database, selected and reviewed. They were categorized according to the decision problem associated with SDGs issues, the MCDM methodological approach, including the use (or not) of fuzzy set theory, sensitivity analysis, and multistakeholder approaches, the context of MCDM applications, and the MCDM classification (if utility-based, compromise, multi-objective, outranking, or other MCDM methods). The widespread adoption of MCDM methods in complex contexts confirms that they can help decision-makers solve multidimensional problems associated with key issues within the 2030 Agenda framework. Besides, the state-of-art review provides an improved understanding of this research field and directions for building a research agenda for those interested in advancing the research on MCDM applications in issues associated with the 2030 Agenda framework.

show abstract

Section: Society: Sdg 2 Sdg 3 Sdg 4 Sdg 7 and Sdg 11mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Sdg 11: Sustainable Cities and Communitiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Sdg 11: Sustainable Cities and Communitiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Sdg 11: Sustainable Cities and Communitiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Multiple Criteria Decision Making for the Achievement of the UN Sustainable Development Goals: A Systematic Literature Review and a Research Agenda

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, the most used definition for sustainability was introduced by the World Commission on Environment and Development in 1987, which defined the sustainability as "development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs" (WCED, 1987). It places emphasis on the balance of the three concepts: environmental protection, social equity and economic development (Drexhage and Murphy, 2010;Litman, 2011;Said et al, 2017;Mohamad and Ahmad, 2016).…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

People’s perceptions of sustainable housing in developing countries: the case of Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Alqahtany

2020

HCS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore the people’s perceptions of sustainable housing in Saudi Arabia using Riyadh as a case study. Riyadh was chosen as a case study for two reasons: it is the capital city of Saudi Arabia and the largest city in the country; and there are no major differences between the characteristics of people in Riyadh and other major Saudi cities. Design/methodology/approach The questionnaire survey technique was used in this study to achieve the main purpose. The study used descriptive statistics (frequency, percentage) with the aid of the Statistical Package of Social Science Software (SPSS) to analyze the data. Findings The findings reveal that there is a lack of people’s awareness about the sustainable housing. However, it shows a positive response regarding people’s willingness to live in sustainable housing in the future as well as to adjust their current houses to be more environmentally friendly houses. Research limitations/implications The thoughts of stakeholders who are involved in the housing field, including policymakers and real estate developers, are very significant, however, due to the time limitation it has not been explored in this study. Therefore, future research is recommended to investigate the opinions of different stakeholders to have better insights for delivering sustainable housing. Originality/value The study contributes to exploring the people’s perceptions of sustainable housing in Saudi Arabia using Riyadh as a case study. Only a few studies have discussed this issue, so this study was conducted to bridge this research gap and build upon the literature.

show abstract

The aspiration for a sustainable affordable housing framework in Malaysia

Sohaimi,

Hassan,

Yusoff

et al. 2023

27th International Meeting of Thermophysics 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Owners’ Perception towards Sustainable Housing Affordability in Kuching, Sarawak

Cited by 12 publications

References 18 publications

Multiple Criteria Decision Making for the Achievement of the UN Sustainable Development Goals: A Systematic Literature Review and a Research Agenda

Multiple Criteria Decision Making for the Achievement of the UN Sustainable Development Goals: A Systematic Literature Review and a Research Agenda

People’s perceptions of sustainable housing in developing countries: the case of Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

The aspiration for a sustainable affordable housing framework in Malaysia

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About