2016
DOI: 10.5465/ambpp.2016.12648abstract
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ownership Control of Foreign Affiliates: A Property Rights Theory Perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this context, property rights theory stresses that it is optimal for ownership control to rest with those who have the greatest impact on the value of the venture (Meyer et al, 1992). Driffield et al (2016) argue that ownership structure follows the evolution in the value contributed by each partner, this explains why in our case the share of the government decreased.…”
Section: Ownership Evolution Follows the Relative Contribution Of Shamentioning
confidence: 59%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In this context, property rights theory stresses that it is optimal for ownership control to rest with those who have the greatest impact on the value of the venture (Meyer et al, 1992). Driffield et al (2016) argue that ownership structure follows the evolution in the value contributed by each partner, this explains why in our case the share of the government decreased.…”
Section: Ownership Evolution Follows the Relative Contribution Of Shamentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Our focus on ownership evolution also implies that our analysis contributes to the literature based on property rights theory perspective (Driffield et al, 2016). We argue that as such entrepreneurial ventures become more secure and transaction costs are overcome, government involvement can decrease, whilst other corporate interests can increase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It follows that negative influences, institutional voids (Khanna and Palepu 2005) and high country risks in general should have adverse consequences for inward FDI via L-advantages. This is confirmed by the meta-study of Bailey (2018), by Driffield et al (2016), and by Goswami and Haider (2014); who find FDI was discouraged by such factors as corruption, tax rates and cultural distance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 67%