2004
DOI: 10.1162/0034653041811761
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ownership of Stocks and Mutual Funds: A Panel Data Analysis

Abstract: This paper analyzes the ownership dynamics of stocks and mutual funds, using representative household panel data, the Dutch CentER Savings Survey 1993-1998. A bivariate dynamic binary-choice model is introduced, allowing for interactions between the two types of assets. We find that unobserved heterogeneity and state dependence play a large role for both types of assets. The positive relation between ownership of one type in one period and the other type in the next period is explained by correlated unobserved… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
120
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
8
120
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This indicates that the reciprocal effect has an important role in determining the structural re-lationship. Also, it implies that a unidirectional approach for modeling property offending and employment is less appropriate (Alessie, Hochguertel, & van Soest, 2004).…”
Section: Trivariate Model Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicates that the reciprocal effect has an important role in determining the structural re-lationship. Also, it implies that a unidirectional approach for modeling property offending and employment is less appropriate (Alessie, Hochguertel, & van Soest, 2004).…”
Section: Trivariate Model Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model is a modified version of the one in Alessie et al (2004) and similar to that used by Stewart (2007) to analyse the interrelated dynamics of unemployment and low-wage employment and by Picchio (2008) to study the stepping-stone effect of temporary jobs. Equation (1) shows that in each time period the probability of individual i of being out of the workforce at time t is determined by a vector of observed characteristics, x it , by unobserved heterogeneity, c 1i , and by the previous employment situation (employment without training, employment with training, or nonemployment).…”
Section: Econometric Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We follow Alessie et al (2004) and adopt a Heckman-type initial condition solution. We specify the initial conditions as (1) and (6), this forms a system of dynamic binary choice equations.…”
Section: Endogeneity Of Fertilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We specify the initial conditions as (1) and (6), this forms a system of dynamic binary choice equations. These are estimated jointly as in Alessie et al (2004). The only difference is that we use a point mass approach.…”
Section: Endogeneity Of Fertilitymentioning
confidence: 99%