2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0921-4488(00)00221-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ownership pattern and management practices of small ruminants in The Gambia — implications for a breeding programme

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

23
67
1
10

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
23
67
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…The results confirm that small ruminants are non-pooled household resources in southern Benin and individual owners are independent decision-makers who have different socioeconomic characteristics and also different objectives and preferences. These findings are in agreement with the results of previous studies (Okali and Sumberg 1986;Jaitner et al 2001). In the study area, household income was not pooled, and household members often had separate, culturally designated obligations to meet different sets of needs within and beyond the household.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results confirm that small ruminants are non-pooled household resources in southern Benin and individual owners are independent decision-makers who have different socioeconomic characteristics and also different objectives and preferences. These findings are in agreement with the results of previous studies (Okali and Sumberg 1986;Jaitner et al 2001). In the study area, household income was not pooled, and household members often had separate, culturally designated obligations to meet different sets of needs within and beyond the household.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…In Gambia, Jaitner et al (2001) found that small ruminants are non-pooled household resources and are independently owned and managed by household members who are often women. Similar observations were made in Nigeria (Okali and Sumberg 1986;Ajala 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Farmers reared goats more for pleasure than for money. These results were quite different from those found in other tropical countries, where insurance and income were highly ranked as reasons for keeping goats (Jaitner et al, 2001;Dossa et al, 2007;Kosgey et al, 2008). Second, goat stealing and wandering dog attacks discouraged farmers.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…Health was not seen as a desired trait. These results are consistent with those of for goats in Martinique, of Jaitner et al (2001) for West African Dwarf goats in Gambia and with those of Kosgey et al (2008) for small ruminants in Kenya. They differed from the preference of the Djallonké goat breeder in Benin (Dossa et al, 2007) who considered as equally important reproduction, behaviour, health and meat production.…”
Section: Production Systems Of Creole Goatsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…A study in the Taurus Mountain villages in Turkey found that most women farmers had little access to information about animal production through public extension services (Budaka et al, 2005). Similar findings have been documented in Cameroon, Ghana and Madagascar (Salman et al, 1999), in Pakistan (Teufel et al, 1998) and in The Gambia (Jaitner et al, 2001). The reasons given for this lack of access to extension services by women included women's long workdays, which precluded them from engaging with, or searching out, extension officers, a neglect of women's needs and circumstances when targeting extension work, and widespread female illiteracy.…”
Section: Importance Of Livestock For Womenmentioning
confidence: 66%