2006
DOI: 10.1504/ijbe.2006.010924
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ownership structure, organisational flexibility and store performance in retail chains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Input flexibility, b. process flexibility and c. outcome flexibility. Organizations do not need to risk much because operational flexibility increases a firm's ability to steer itself in the face of environmental changes (Volberda et al, 2006). According to Mcfadden et al (2006), management should have enough types of equipment which can be used in case of emergency.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Input flexibility, b. process flexibility and c. outcome flexibility. Organizations do not need to risk much because operational flexibility increases a firm's ability to steer itself in the face of environmental changes (Volberda et al, 2006). According to Mcfadden et al (2006), management should have enough types of equipment which can be used in case of emergency.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Структуризацію гнучкості підприємств проведено у наукових працях багатьох вчених (Yang & Li, 2002;Volberda et al, 2006;Weerdt, 2009). Питання оцінювання рівня гнучкості суб'єктів бізнесу широко дослідили деякі зарубіжні науковці (Goldman et al, 1995;Dove, 1996;Vokurka & Fliedner, 1998;Sherehiy et al, 2007;Yauch, 2011). Кількісне оцінювання гнучкості господарюючих суб'єктів на базі положень теорії нечітких множин пропонують деякі науковці (Tsourveloudis & Valavanis, 2002;Yang & Li, 2002;Lin et al, 2006).…”
Section: вступunclassified