2022
DOI: 10.1007/s12109-022-09901-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

#Ownvoices, Disruptive Platforms, and Reader Reception in Young Adult Publishing

Abstract: The concept of #ownvoices writing has gained traction in contemporary publishing as both a genre of reader interest and a focus for debates about authors’ rights to write cross-culturally. This paper examines tensions the #ownvoices movement reveals between the commissioning, publishing, and critical reception of a book, using debate about Craig Silvey’s Honeybee, an Australian novel focalized through a young trans protagonist but written by a straight male author. Drawing on the theory of recognition, it anal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It obscures, for example, the role comps play as an invisible decision-making convention that maintains (and is maintained by) institutional arrangements over which readers have very little, if any, control. Notably, such arrangements—wherein editors decide what to acquire partly on the basis of “data-informed” predictions about what (some) readers will buy rather than substantive knowledge of their audience’s desires or practices (Rutherford et al ., 2022)—are not actually inconsistent with librarianship’s going account of the freedom to read. But the pervasive absence of agency that Miller describes has substantive implications for what one can access (physically, intellectually and aesthetically), as well as which stories, experiences, perspectives and subjects are rendered intelligible and valuable across a society.…”
Section: Pivoting To a Structural Accountmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It obscures, for example, the role comps play as an invisible decision-making convention that maintains (and is maintained by) institutional arrangements over which readers have very little, if any, control. Notably, such arrangements—wherein editors decide what to acquire partly on the basis of “data-informed” predictions about what (some) readers will buy rather than substantive knowledge of their audience’s desires or practices (Rutherford et al ., 2022)—are not actually inconsistent with librarianship’s going account of the freedom to read. But the pervasive absence of agency that Miller describes has substantive implications for what one can access (physically, intellectually and aesthetically), as well as which stories, experiences, perspectives and subjects are rendered intelligible and valuable across a society.…”
Section: Pivoting To a Structural Accountmentioning
confidence: 99%