1961
DOI: 10.1149/1.2428078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oxidation and Equilibrium in Nonstoichiometric Zirconium Dioxide Powder

Abstract: Two properties of nonstoichiometric zirconium dioxide powder have been studied. Pressures of oxygen in equilibrium with ZrO2−x , with 0.03 > x > 0, have been determined at temperatures of 900°, 1000°, and 1100°C by passing hydrogen‐water vapor mixtures over the oxide. The measured pressures are in the range 10−20 to 10−12 atm. Rates of oxidation of ZrO1.975 to ZrO2 in oxygen have been measured at 500°–650°C. The activation energy for the oxidation, based on a diffusion mechanism, is 58.0 kcal/mole. A compar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
15
1

Year Published

1965
1965
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In Ref. [3] we see that D tot increases with oxygen partial pressure, which hints at an oxygen-interstitial-dominated mechanism and is in agreement with our prediction. To compare quantitatively with experimentally measured values, we calculate the effective activation energies Q and effective prefactors D * by fitting the total self-diffusivity…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In Ref. [3] we see that D tot increases with oxygen partial pressure, which hints at an oxygen-interstitial-dominated mechanism and is in agreement with our prediction. To compare quantitatively with experimentally measured values, we calculate the effective activation energies Q and effective prefactors D * by fitting the total self-diffusivity…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The trend in diffusivity change from 0.03 to 0.13 atm in Ref. [3] is more reliable considering the measurements were performed on samples with the same impurity level. In Ref.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 3 more Smart Citations