Oxidation of Antitubercular Drug Isoniazid by a Lipopathic Oxidant, Cetyltrimethylammonium Dichromate: A Mechanistic Study

Abstract

The oxidation of an antitubercular drug isoniazid by a lipopathic oxidant cetyltrimethylammonium dichromate (CTADC) in a nonpolar medium generates isonicotinic acid both in the presence and the absence of acetic acid. The conventional UV–vis spectrophotometric method is used to study the reaction kinetics. The occurrence of the Michaelis–Menten–type kinetics with respect to isoniazid confirms the binding of oxidant and substrate to form a complex before the rate‐determining step. The existence of the inverse solvent kinetic isotope effect, k(H2O)/ k(D2O) = 0.7, in an acid‐catalyzed reaction proposes a multistep reaction mechanism. A decrease in the rate constant with an increase in [CTADC] reveals the formation of reverse micellar–type aggregates of CTADC in nonpolar solvents. In the presence of different ionic and nonionic surfactants, CTADC forms mixed aggregates and controls the reaction due to the charge on the interface and also due to partition of oxidant and substrate in two different domains. High negative entropy of activation (ΔS‡ = –145 and –159 J K−1 mol−1 in the absence and presence of acetic acid) proposes a more ordered and highly solvated transition state than the reactants. Furthermore, the solvent polarity‐reactivity relationship reveals (i) the presence of less polar and less ionic transition state compared to the reactants during the oxidation, (ii) differential contribution from nonpolar and dipolar aprotic solvents toward the reaction process, and (iii) the existence of polarity/hydrophobic switch at log P = 0.73. A suitable mechanism has been proposed on the basis of experimental results. These results may provide insight into the mechanism of isoniazid oxidation in hydrophobic environment and may assist in understanding the drug resistance in different location.

Surfactant for better tomorrow: applied aspect of surfactant aggregates from laboratory to industry

“…(c) The hydrogen bonding or hydrophobic interaction between the nonionic micelles and anionic form of amino acid (in alkali medium) plays an important role [93]. (d) A greater attractive interaction between reverse micelle and the cationic head group of lipopathic oxidant established for the rate enhancement [94]. (e) The partitioning mode leads to higher local concentration of both the reactants at the micelle water surface for which preferential rate enhancement in the micellar phase was noticed [95].…”