2009
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.71-73.385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oxidation of Chalcopyrite (CuFeS<sub>2</sub>) by <i>Acidithiobacillus Ferrooxidans</i> and a Mixed Culture of <i>Acidithiobacillus Ferrooxidans</i> and <i>Acidithiobacillus Thiooxidans</i> Like Bacterium in Shake Flasks

Abstract: Chalcopyrite bioleaching process using Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans and a mixed culture of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans and Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans like bacterium was carried out. Two mineral particle sizes were evaluated, 200 and 325 Tyler mesh. The strains were adapted by gradually decreasing of the main energy sources and increasing in the mineral content. The experiments were performed in absence of ferrous sulphate and elemental sulfur. When the mixed culture was used, pH values were always over… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
4
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In the higher potential area (days [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30], the release of copper was smaller than that in the lower-potential region because there might not have been enough ferrous ion to promote chalcopyrite bioleaching. The present findings agree with those of previous works [3,4,10,34,35]. The hypotheses in these works were that the chalcopyrite dissolution was catalyzed by the ferrous ion according to the following reactions (1-3):…”
Section: Chalcopyrite Leaching Experimentssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the higher potential area (days [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30], the release of copper was smaller than that in the lower-potential region because there might not have been enough ferrous ion to promote chalcopyrite bioleaching. The present findings agree with those of previous works [3,4,10,34,35]. The hypotheses in these works were that the chalcopyrite dissolution was catalyzed by the ferrous ion according to the following reactions (1-3):…”
Section: Chalcopyrite Leaching Experimentssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Jarosite phase could be considered as the unfavorable phase because its presence apparently would passivate the copper release [5,10,11,16,[34][35][36][37][38]. The jarosite formation was more marked from 15 th day onward, when the system showed a lower concentration of ferrous ion, a higher concentration of ferric ion, increased redox potential, and a high concentration of SO 4…”
Section: Mineralogical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lo cual puede deberse a la formación de pares galvánicos de los sulfuros en contacto, favoreciendo la disolución del sulfuro con menor potencial de reposo. Por ejemplo, se ha reportado que la esfalerita en contacto con calcopirita favorece la disolución de la esfalerita y que la esfalerita en contacto con galena favorece la disolución de esta última (Mejía, Ospina, Márquez, & Morales, 2009;Urbano, Meléndez, Reyes, Veloz, González, 2007).…”
Section: Ensayo Bunclassified
“…Temperature, pH, physiologies of individual species, and other factors, such as metals and toxic ions, are determinative factors for the "logically designed" consortium. Previous reports indicated that cultures prepared on the basis of the bottom-up approach were more efficient in accelerating mineral oxidation (2,7,(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29). A previous study by us had demonstrated that a culture containing autotrophs and mixotrophs was far more effective in promoting chalcopyrite leaching than a mixed culture containing any combination of two or three of the four species (Acidithiobacillus caldus, Leptospirillum ferriphilum, Sulfobacillus sp., and Ferroplasma thermophilum) (30).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%