2016
DOI: 10.1039/c6ra18072h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oxidation of natural organic matter with processes involving O3, H2O2and UV light: formation of oxidation and disinfection by-products

Abstract: This study investigates the effects of UV photolysis, ozonation and different advanced oxidation processes (O3/UV, H2O2/UV and O3/H2O2/UV) on the oxidation of groundwater natural organic matter (NOM) and by-product formation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The THM precursor results at the two higher ozone doses are in agreement with Lamsal et al (2011), who achieved 75% removal of THM precursors under similar treatment conditions. These results are also comparable with our previous research, carried out in a different groundwater with greater NOM content, whereby a slight reduction (17%) in THMFP was observed after the O 3 / UV process (0.5 mg O 3 /mg DOC; 3000 mJ/cm 2 ) (Agbaba et al 2016). The HAA precursors behaved somewhat differently, with the same general trend observed at each ozone dose: addition of UV to the process has a negative impact on treatment performance, with lesser removals by the combined process with increasing UV fluence.…”
Section: Influence Of Uv Photolysis O 3 and O 3 /Uv On Dbp Formationsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The THM precursor results at the two higher ozone doses are in agreement with Lamsal et al (2011), who achieved 75% removal of THM precursors under similar treatment conditions. These results are also comparable with our previous research, carried out in a different groundwater with greater NOM content, whereby a slight reduction (17%) in THMFP was observed after the O 3 / UV process (0.5 mg O 3 /mg DOC; 3000 mJ/cm 2 ) (Agbaba et al 2016). The HAA precursors behaved somewhat differently, with the same general trend observed at each ozone dose: addition of UV to the process has a negative impact on treatment performance, with lesser removals by the combined process with increasing UV fluence.…”
Section: Influence Of Uv Photolysis O 3 and O 3 /Uv On Dbp Formationsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…AOPs generate highly reactive and nonselective hydroxyl radicals (HO • ) which are capable, via the creation of lower molecular weight (MW) intermediates, of mineralising most organic compounds to non-toxic carbondioxide and water (Sanly et al 2007). Among the AOPs used for drinking water treatment, ozone/ultraviolet (O 3 /UV) has been shown to result in significant NOM removal and reduction of DBPs formation potential, although the changes in NOM properties during chlorination may result in the formation of other DBPs instead (Chin and Bérubé 2005;Matilainen and Sillanpää 2010;Lamsal et al 2011;Agbaba et al 2016). UV irradiation was found to successfully decrease the ozone dose required during ozonation, which in turn reduces the formation of carcinogenic bromate (Meunier et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of the 150 W UV lamp allowed for an over 32% reduction of TOC concentration. A decrease of organic matter was also reported by other investigation focused on the use of UV light [16]. According to high removal degrees of most of the tested micropollutants it was expected, that the concentration of TOC also decreases by more than 50%.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The use of the 150 W UV lamp allowed for an over 32% reduction of TOC concentration. A decrease of organic matter was also reported by other investigation focused on the use of UV light [16].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…There has also been interest in the application of H 2 O 2 /UV oxidation for source water pretreatment, which was found to enhance fouling mitigation and NOM rejection for nanofiltration (Song et al, 2004;Zhang et al, 2015), and was beneficial within an integrated MBR treatment process (Laera et al, 2012). Other studies have also reported that the use of an oxidation pre-treatment process can enhance final water quality, such as a reduction in trihalomethane and haloacetic acid formation potentials (Agbaba et al, 2016), and the use of H 2 O 2 /UVC treatment removed more than 99.9% of all added pollutants, mineralized 63% of organic compounds and achieved a complete disinfection of total coliforms (Rueda-Marquez et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%