We
report a combined experimental and computational study focused
on the mechanism of oxidative conversion of benzene and ethylene to
styrene using [(η2-C2H4)2Rh(μ-OAc)]2 as the catalyst precursor in
the presence of Cu(OPiv)2 (OPiv = pivalate). Using [(η2-C2H4)2Rh(μ-OAc)]2 as the catalyst precursor, ∼411 turnovers of styrene
are observed after 1 h, giving an apparent turnover frequency of ∼0.11
s–1 (calculated assuming the binuclear structure
is maintained in the active catalyst). We identify the catalyst resting
state to be [(η2-C2H4)2RhI(μ-OPiv)2]2(μ-Cu),
which is a heterotrinuclear molecular complex in which a central CuII atom bridges two Rh moieties. At high Rh concentration in
the presence of Cu(OPiv)2 and pivalic acid (HOPiv), the
trinuclear complex [(η2-C2H4)2RhI(μ-OPiv)2]2(μ-Cu) converts to the binuclear Rh(II) complex [(HOPiv)RhII(μ-OPiv)2]2, which has been identified
by 1H NMR spectroscopy and single crystal X-ray diffraction.
The binuclear Rh(II) [(HOPiv)RhII(μ-OPiv)2]2 is not a catalyst for styrene production, but under
catalytic conditions [(HOPiv)RhII(μ-OPiv)2]2 can be partially converted to the active catalyst,
the Rh–Cu–Rh complex [(η2-C2H4)2RhI(μ-OPiv)2]2(μ-Cu), following an induction period of ∼6
h. Using quantum chemical calculations, we sampled possible mononuclear
and binuclear Rh species, finding that the binuclear Rh(II) [(HOPiv)RhII(μ-OPiv)2]2 paddle-wheel is a
low energy global minimum, which is consistent with experimental observations
that [(HOPiv)RhII(μ-OPiv)2]2 is not a catalyst for styrene formation. Further, we investigated
the mechanism of styrene production starting from [(η2-C2H4)2RhI(μ-OAc)2]2(μ-Cu), [(η2-C2H4)2Rh(μ-OAc)]2, and (η2-C2H4)2Rh(κ2-OAc). For all reaction pathways studied, the predicted activation
barriers for styrene formation from [(η2-C2H4)2Rh(μ-OAc)]2 and (η2-C2H4)2Rh(κ2-OAc) are too high compared to experimental kinetics. In contrast,
the overall activation barrier for styrene formation predicted by
DFT from the Rh–Cu–Rh complex [(η2-C2H4)2RhI(μ-OPiv)2]2(μ-Cu) is in agreement with experimentally
determined rates of catalysis. Based on these results, we conclude
that incorporation of Cu(II) into the active Rh–Cu–Rh
catalyst reduces the activation barrier for benzene C–H activation,
O–H reductive elimination, and ethylene insertion into the
Rh–Ph bond.