2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0009-2541(02)00124-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oxidative dissolution of pyritic sludge from the Aznalcóllar mine (SW Spain)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
43
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
7
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, since the pyrite dissolution rate (ca. 10 −10 mol m −2 s −1 at pH from 3 to 5 and O 2 concentration of 3 × 10 −4 mol L −1 ; Domènech et al, 2002) was approximately six to seven orders of magnitude slower than that of gypsum (10 −3 mol m −2 s −1 ; Palandri and Kharaka, 2004), it was assumed that most of the released S was from dissolving gypsum. As the gypsum dissolution rate was not affected by dissolved CO 2 (Jeschke et al, 2001) or by pH, the S decrease was probably caused by a decrease in the gypsum reactive surface area as gypsum dissolved (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, since the pyrite dissolution rate (ca. 10 −10 mol m −2 s −1 at pH from 3 to 5 and O 2 concentration of 3 × 10 −4 mol L −1 ; Domènech et al, 2002) was approximately six to seven orders of magnitude slower than that of gypsum (10 −3 mol m −2 s −1 ; Palandri and Kharaka, 2004), it was assumed that most of the released S was from dissolving gypsum. As the gypsum dissolution rate was not affected by dissolved CO 2 (Jeschke et al, 2001) or by pH, the S decrease was probably caused by a decrease in the gypsum reactive surface area as gypsum dissolved (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Change in mineral surface area A m (m 2 mineral m −3 rock) is calculated assuming that area is proportional to the volume fraction of the mineral to the power 2/3. The numerical model developed to reproduce the experimental conditions ("batch" simulation) considered (a) the mineralogical composition of the rock according to the measured values by XRF and (b) the rate laws for the reacting minerals showed in the literature [44][45][46][47].…”
Section: Applied Techniques and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solubilisation kinetics have been reported to differ between metal suphides: Caille et al [88] found lead and copper sulphides were released more rapidly than zinc. Whilst Domenech et al [91] noted that sphalerite (ZnS) oxidized faster than pyrite (FeS 2 ) and galena (PbS) and chalcopyrite (CuFeS 2 ) had similar oxidation rates to pyrite. Furthermore the rate of galena dissolution was enhanced at low pH, an effect not apparent for sphalerite or chalcopyrite.…”
Section: Changes In Mineral Form and The Release Of Trace Metal Contamentioning
confidence: 99%