2022
DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.13346
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oxidative stress‐induced FAK activation contributes to uterine serous carcinoma aggressiveness

Abstract: originated spheroids (CTOS) and a patient-derived orthotopic xenograft model (orthoxenograft/PDOX). Defactinib reduces cell proliferation and protein oxidation, supporting a pro-tumoral antioxidant role of FAK, whereas antioxidant NAC reverts FAK inhibitor effects. Overall, our data points to ROS-mediated FAK activation in USC as being responsible for the poor prognosis of this tumor type and emphasize the potential of FAK inhibition for USC treatment.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This heightened oxidative stress leads to the phosphorylation of FAK, facilitating tumor invasion and metastasis through the ROS-FAK-PAX signaling pathway. Defactinib significantly inhibited the growth of the tumors of patient-derived orthotopic xenograft models in this context, emphasizing the potential of FAK inhibition in the treatment of USC ( Lopez-Mejia et al, 2023 ).…”
Section: Development and Clinical Research Progress Of Fak Inhibitorsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This heightened oxidative stress leads to the phosphorylation of FAK, facilitating tumor invasion and metastasis through the ROS-FAK-PAX signaling pathway. Defactinib significantly inhibited the growth of the tumors of patient-derived orthotopic xenograft models in this context, emphasizing the potential of FAK inhibition in the treatment of USC ( Lopez-Mejia et al, 2023 ).…”
Section: Development and Clinical Research Progress Of Fak Inhibitorsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…PKN1 activation levels were assessed via Western blot technique using an anti-Phospho-PRK1 (Thr774)/PRK2 (Thr816) antibody. Cells were washed with cold PBS and either lysed with NP-40 buffer supplemented with Proteases and Phosphatases inhibitors or with SDS lysis buffer (2% SDS, 125 mM Tris–HCL pH6.8), and lysates were subjected to Western blotting, as described in a previous work [ 17 ]. Equal amounts of proteins were resolved in 10–15% SDS-PAGE gels and transferred to PVDF membranes (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%