“…Therefore, the development of safe and benign methods for the real-time identification and quantification in the ppb level of such a toxicant in water has become a very crucial task demanding contemporary research. Several chemical-based analytical methods have been employed for the trace-level identification of arsenate, for example, inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES), capillary electrophoresis inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (CE-ICP-MS), − neutron activation analysis (NAA), atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS), , hydride generation atomic fluorescence spectrometry (HG-AFS), HPLC, and cathodic stripping voltammetry, and anodic stripping voltammetry (CSV and ASV). − However, these techniques are costly, time-consuming, or necessitate complicated working procedures and arduous sample preparation. Sensing methods have already become the greatest way of analysis due to them being less expensive, nondestructive, simple processes, capable of naked-eye monitoring, rapid analysis, having a low limit of detection (LOD), and good selectivity. − …”