Carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) technologies
can
efficiently contribute to the mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions.
Carbon capture with pressurized water is applied in the ammonia plant,
and it has recently gained significant attention due to its environmentally
friendly features. In this study, the technoeconomic evaluation of
the water-based carbon capture system is carried out and compared
with the alternative using aqueous MEA solution. The flue gas originates
from a gas-fired power plant. Two options are considered: (i) an air-combustion
system and (ii) an oxyfuel combustion system. The calculated results
show that in both air and oxyfuel-combustion technologies, the power
consumption of the H2O–CO2 capture method
exceeds that of the MEA–CO2 capture method by approximately
30% and 45%, respectively. This considerable difference notably increases
the operational costs of the power plant. However, by the application
of gas dehydration before the H2O–CO2 capture technique, the power consumption and the cost of water-based
carbon capture can be significantly decreased. Although such an improvement
makes the water-based carbon capture system the least energy consuming
alternative, it requires mainly electricity and still has higher utility
costs compared to MEA-based alternatives.