2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2007.04.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oxygen and sulfur isotope systematics of sulfate produced by bacterial and abiotic oxidation of pyrite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

22
247
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 356 publications
(276 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
22
247
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A good agreement between estimated sulfate and the actual measurements were determined in young lakes (AMLs 5 and 4) unlike old lakes (AMLs 2 and 1) (see Table 3); this can be attributed to different sulfur species in the lakes. For example, enhanced pyrite oxidation and production of solid elemental sulfur, as evidenced by higher sulfate concentration in the oldest lakes, may cause sulfur imbalance (Balci et al 2007). It is also possible that the precipitation of Fe(III) sulfate minerals (e.g., jarosite) in Fe-rich lakes (AMLs 1 and 2) may cause this discrepancy in sulfur budget and emphasizes different S and Fe chemistry in the lakes.…”
Section: Water Column and Sediments Of Amlmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…A good agreement between estimated sulfate and the actual measurements were determined in young lakes (AMLs 5 and 4) unlike old lakes (AMLs 2 and 1) (see Table 3); this can be attributed to different sulfur species in the lakes. For example, enhanced pyrite oxidation and production of solid elemental sulfur, as evidenced by higher sulfate concentration in the oldest lakes, may cause sulfur imbalance (Balci et al 2007). It is also possible that the precipitation of Fe(III) sulfate minerals (e.g., jarosite) in Fe-rich lakes (AMLs 1 and 2) may cause this discrepancy in sulfur budget and emphasizes different S and Fe chemistry in the lakes.…”
Section: Water Column and Sediments Of Amlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oxidation of sulfide minerals to sulfate at low temperatures is generally a quantitative and unidirectional process that causes negligible sulfur-isotope fractionation. This often results in d 34 S SO 4 values being indistinguishable from those of the parent sulfide minerals (Gavelin et al 1960;Nakai and Jensen 1964;Field 1966;Rye et al 1992;Balci et al 2007Balci et al , 2012. Because negligible and minor fractionation of S isotopes occurs during the oxidative weathering of sulfide minerals (Field 1966;Seal 2003;Balci et al 2007Balci et al , 2012, the d 34 S signature of dissolved SO 4 in the lakes should be similar to that of the sulfur source.…”
Section: Water Column and Sediments Of Amlmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations