“…MOFs have demonstrated broad application prospects in gas separation, energy storage, chemical detection, catalysis, and so on. − As compared to other photocatalytic materials, MOFs possess ultrahigh surface areas, numerous catalytic active sites, tailored chemical functionalities, flexibility, and versatility, which bestow upon them the promising catalytic performance. − In recent years, MOFs have been extensively used for water pollution treatment and bactericidal activities. For examples, many classic framework systems such as MIL-100(Fe), MIL-101(Fe), MOF-74(Zn/Fe), and ZIF-8(Zn) have been reported for the adsorption and decomposition of water pollutants. − ZIF-8(Zn), ZIF-11(Zn), Prussian blue nanoparticles (PBNPs), and so on have been found to have excellent sterilization effects. ,,− Although great progress has been made, the catalytic properties of these MOFs are mainly derived from metal clusters, and organic ligands usually serve as the connecting pillars or charge transfer moieties. , However, MOFs constructed with organic photosensitizer ligands could circumvent the aggregation-caused quenching (ACQ) effect faced by most organic photosensitizers, as the porous framework presents the close intramolecular packing of these photosensitizers. ,,, MOFs also provide more surface area and heavy atom effects, − which are beneficial for ROS generation. Porphyrin derivatives are one of the most common photosensitizers, and the porphyrin-based MOFs have been applied in photodynamic therapy, photocatalytic CO 2 reduction, photocatalytic water splitting, antibacterial, sterilization, and so on. − However, the application of porphyrin-based MOFs in water pollution treatment is still less progressed, especially for the 2D layered MOFs which possess abundant catalytic active sites, a higher density of defects, and exchangeable coordination sites over 3D MOFs …”