Oxygen microprofiles within the sediment-water interface studied by optode and its implication for aeration of polluted urban rivers

Abstract

To reveal the detailed vertical oxygen distribution at the sediment-water interface (SWI) and its relation with the oxygen consumption processes during and after aeration of polluted urban rivers, experimental systems constructed with collected sediment and in situ overlying water from a polluted urban river were aerated above or beneath the sediment-water interface 12 h a day for 15 days and left nonaerated for the following 10 days. The results showed that aeration of water or sediment both increased dissolved oxygen (DO) concentrations in the SWI, characterized by shifts in a "decrease-increase-decrease" manner during around 3 h for the aeration of water treatment (AW) and 6 h for the aeration of sediment treatment (AS). The oxygen penetration depth for AS experiments was between 0.66 and 4.16 mm with an average of 1.79 mm, significantly higher than that for AW experiments; however, the oxygen dissipation constant (mm) measuring the decay rate of DO near the SWI was greater for the AW experiments than the AS experiments. During the 10-day nonaeration period, the accumulation of nitrate in both the overlying water and sediment was greatly increased concomitantly with the higher oxygenation in AS experiments. From the nitrogen removal viewpoint, these results suggest that the SWI needs moderate oxygenation which enables nitrate and nitrite to be removed by denitrification rather than to be totally nitrified and accumulate as would result from the conventional practice by singly elevating DO concentrations.

Evaluation and mechanism of ammonia nitrogen removal using sediments from a malodorous river

“…In addition, the large amounts of sediments in such rivers require efficient disposition, which is realized through resourceful utilization. At present, the main technology for river sediment treatment includes on-site and off-site technologies, such as artificial aeration [ 12 ], coagulation [ 13 ], bioremediation [ 14 ] and dredging of sediment landfills [ 15 ], dehydration after dredging [ 16 ] and sediment pyrolysis after dehydration [ 17 ]. However, the on-site technologies are unsuitable for large-scale malodorous rivers.…”