Oxygen Therapy

Boothby, Walter M.

doi:10.1001/jama.1928.02690320034009

Cited by 12 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Otras propuestas instan al empleo de ASAT con energía dirigida en detrimento de la cinética: el proceso de targeting se ajustaría mejor a los criterios de discriminación y proporcionalidad, especialmente, porque el ataque afectaría exclusivamente al satélite enemigo en cuestión. Incluso, algún autor ha abogado por utilizar una técnica todavía más discriminatoria: el empleo de acciones cibernéticas dirigidas a inhabilitar los links de los satélites 113 . En teoría, estas propuestas son muy atractivas.…”

Section: Conclusiones Y Reflexiones Finalesunclassified

La capacidad ofensiva de los interceptores cinéticos exo-atmosféricos en el marco del Derecho espacial y humanitario: usos y restricciones

Palazón

2017

Anuario Español de Derecho Internacional

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Resumen: Aunque las defensas antimisiles han sido diseñadas para fines defensivos, la incorporación de interceptores cinéticos exo-atmosféricos las convierte en armas ofensivas al permitir la intercepción no sólo de misiles balísticos sino también de satélites. Si bien las capacidades exo-atmosféricas amplían el alcance estratégi-co de las defensas antimisiles, a su vez, representan una amenaza para los activos espaciales y el medio ambiente espacial. Máxime, dada la ausencia de un régimen legal que prohíba el ensayo o uso de interceptores como armas antisatélite (ASAT). Este artículo se centrará en investigar las restricciones que ofrecen el derecho espacial y humanitario sobre el uso de armas ASAT y sugerirá una serie de medidas que eviten poner en riesgo los recursos orbitales.Palabras clave: Seguridad espacial; medio ambiente espacial; derecho espacial; derecho internacional humanitario; armas ASAT; defensa antimisiles; interceptores exoatmosféricos; tecnología de doble uso.Abstract: Even though missile defences have been designed for defensive purposes, the incorporation of exoatmospheric kill vehicles have brought about they have become in offensive weapons by enabling the interception against ballistic missiles as well as satellites. Although the exoatmospheric capabilities widen the strategic range of missile defences, in turn, these capabilities stand for a threat to space assets and space environment. Notably, given the lack of a legal regime that bans the testing or use of interceptors to engage satellites. This article will be focused on researching the constraints that space law and humanitarian law provide on the use of ASAT weapons and will posit a series of measures to avoid jeopardizing the orbital resources.

show abstract

Section: Conclusiones Y Reflexiones Finalesunclassified

La capacidad ofensiva de los interceptores cinéticos exo-atmosféricos en el marco del Derecho espacial y humanitario: usos y restricciones

Palazón

2017

Anuario Español de Derecho Internacional

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Purpose-built oxygen chambers were subsequently commissioned at several centres, including the Hospital of the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research, New York, 6 Guy’s Hospital, London, 7 and the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 8 Although these were widely perceived as ‘the ideal way to treat anoxaemia from the standpoint of effectiveness and comfort’, 9 the costs of construction and operation were high, 10 and they were ‘obviously impracticable for widespread use.’ 9…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…5 Purpose-built oxygen chambers were subsequently commissioned at several centres, including the Hospital of the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research, New York, 6 Guy's Hospital, London, 7 and the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 8 Although these were widely perceived as 'the ideal way to treat anoxaemia from the standpoint of effectiveness and comfort', 9 the costs of construction and operation were high, 10 and they were 'obviously impracticable for widespread use.' 9 First described by Leonard Hill at a meeting of the Physiological Society in March 1921, 11 the oxygen tent possessed many of the advantages of a chamber with the additional benefits of portability and decreased expense.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%