cues associated with either a high or low electrical pain for 20 times each. In the testing stage, the high cue, low cue, and a new cue were all paired with identical moderate pain for 20 times each. In study 2, a verbal suggestion plus conditioning paradigm was used. Three identical inert ointments were applied to 3 sites on each participant's forearm, with the sites randomized across participants. A female experimenter described ointments as creams that increase pain (nocebo), reduce pain (placebo), and have no effect on pain (control), respectively. After 10 min, the 3 sites were stimulated for 10 times with high, moderate, and low shocks, corresponding to their instructed functions, to strengthen the effect of verbal suggestions. In the subsequent testing stage, all 3 sites were paired with moderate shocks for 20 times each.Participants rated how much pain they felt after each shock, using the same 9-point numeric rating scale. The placebo and nocebo effects were assessed as participants rated the low-cue (study 1) or placebo site (study 2)-associated shock as less painful and high-cue/nocebo site-associated shock as more painful compared to the new-cue/control site-associated shock during the test stage.Data from 12 participants were excluded because of poor pain discrimination during calibration or doubt of ointments' effects, leaving 306 participants for analysis (age, 18-26 years). A 2 (group: oxytocin/saline) × 2 (dosage: 24/40 IU) factorial ANOVA on placebo effect revealed no main effects and interaction effect in both studies (study 1: group, F(1, 156) = 0.16, p = 0.692; dosage, F(1, 156) = 0.06, p = 0.814; group × dosage, F(1, 156) = 0.30, p = 0.588; study 2: group, F(1, 142) = 0.17, p = 0.682; dosage, F(1, 142) = 0.03, p = 0.860; group × dosage, F(1, 142) = 0.09, p = 0.764). A similar ANOVA on nocebo effect also revealed no main effects and interaction effect (study 1: group, F(1, 156) = 0.29, p = 0.589; dosage, F(1, 156) = 0.65, p = 0.420; group × dosage, F(1, 156) = 1.12, p = 0.292; study 2: group, F(1, 142) < 0.001, p = 0.99; dosage, F(1, 142) = 0.57, p = 0.452; group × dosage, F(1, 142) = 0.98, p = 0.324).To further examine whether sex modulates the effect of oxytocin on placebo and nocebo effects, we conducted a 2 (group: oxytocin/ saline) × 2 (dosage: 24/40 IU) × 2 (sex: female/male) factorial ANOVA on placebo and nocebo responses, respectively. Results showed no sex-related effects (p values > 0.1), possibly due to the small number of participants in each subgroup for each gender. In addition, we examined pain ratings in the conditioning stage and found no significant differences across 4 arms in both studies (p values > 0.1), suggesting that the strength of conditioning was well-balanced across groups.In summary, using a randomized, double-blind design, we found no evidence for oxytocin effects on placebo and nocebo across paradigms and dosages in a large sample. Our findings challenge previous findings that placebo responses can be enhanced by the application of intranasal oxytocin and furth...