2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.07.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ozonation strategies to reduce sludge production of a seafood industry WWTP

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Improper treatment of the sludge poses major risks to public health. Currently, the treatment and disposal of excess sludge constitute 50-60% of the operating costs of wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) (Campos et al, 2009). Therefore, cost-effective disposal of the excess sludge into the environment is a serious challenge faced by researchers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improper treatment of the sludge poses major risks to public health. Currently, the treatment and disposal of excess sludge constitute 50-60% of the operating costs of wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) (Campos et al, 2009). Therefore, cost-effective disposal of the excess sludge into the environment is a serious challenge faced by researchers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These excess sludge should be treated before discharge and the treatment costs of the excess sludge were high, which may be accounted for 50-60% of the total operation costs of wastewater treatment plants (Horan, 1999;Campos et al, 2009;Feng et al, 2013). Therefore, effective strategies should be developed to reduce sludge production through either sludge post treatment or sludge in-situ treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The annual production of WAS reached 25 million tons (calculated by 80% of water content) in China in recent years, which might pose a significant threat to ecology system if it was not properly disposed (Yang et al, 2010). In most developed countries, like European countries, WAS were conventionally treated by concentration and anaerobic digestion, which would account for 60% of the total operating cost of WWTPs (Campos et al, 2009), and that could not be accepted by many developing countries. Therefore, cost effective or towards reuse technologies for WAS disposal need to be developed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%