2001
DOI: 10.1080/10473289.2001.10464261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ozone Air Quality over North America: Part II—An Analysis of Trend Detection and Attribution Techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sixth problem is that the changes in datareporting practices in the 1990s can distort trend assessments, as pointed out by Henry et al 11 The effects of all six of these problems on trend assessments are discussed further in the companion paper. 5 Nevertheless, the linear trends identified using the raw O 3 data and the data adjusted for meteorology still provide some useful information on the direction of the trends. Consequently, these earlier studies are summarized here along with the more recent studies.…”
Section: Limitations Of Existing Trend Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The sixth problem is that the changes in datareporting practices in the 1990s can distort trend assessments, as pointed out by Henry et al 11 The effects of all six of these problems on trend assessments are discussed further in the companion paper. 5 Nevertheless, the linear trends identified using the raw O 3 data and the data adjusted for meteorology still provide some useful information on the direction of the trends. Consequently, these earlier studies are summarized here along with the more recent studies.…”
Section: Limitations Of Existing Trend Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of using different years of data on linear trend estimates is illustrated in the companion paper. 5 Finally, the trend estimation techniques used in the two studies are quite different, and Milanchus et al 21 included more meteorological variables in their analysis to remove the effects of Figure 2. Percent of variance in the daily maximum 1-hr O 3 concentrations during 1985-1986 explained by meteorological variables (temperature and specific humidity on the seasonal and climatic scales, and temperature and dew-point depression on the synoptic scale, as in Milanchus et al 21 ).…”
Section: Ozone Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Different authors used photochemical models and/or analysed the effects with the help of statistical analyses (AndreaniAksoyoglu and Keller, 1996;Sistla et al, 1996;Porter et al, 2001). Other model studies showed the effect of the emission on the ozone formation using different grid sizes (Jang et al, 1995;Li et al, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This filtered out fluctuations with a period less than 12 hours and maintained all other fluctuations without as described in Tchepel et al (2010). Additional details on the KZ filter can be found in Hogrefe et al (2000), Rao and Zurbenko (1994), and Porter et al (2001).…”
Section: 2 Detrending Kz Filter and Cospectrummentioning
confidence: 99%