Ozone depletion and climate change: impacts on UV radiation

Abstract

We assess the importance of factors that determine the intensity of UV radiation at the Earth's surface. Among these, atmospheric ozone, which absorbs UV radiation, is of considerable importance, but other constituents of the atmosphere, as well as certain consequences of climate change, can also be major influences. Further, we assess the variations of UV radiation observed in the past and present, and provide projections for the future. Of particular interest are methods to measure or estimate UV radiation at the Earth's surface. These are needed for scientific understanding and, when they are sufficiently sensitive, they can serve as monitors of the effectiveness of the Montreal Protocol and its amendments. Also assessed are several aspects of UV radiation related to biological effects and health. The implications for ozone and UV radiation from two types of geoengineering methods that have been proposed to combat climate change are also discussed. In addition to ozone effects, the UV changes in the last two decades, derived from measurements, have been influenced by changes in aerosols, clouds, surface reflectivity, and, possibly, by solar activity. The positive trends of UV radiation observed after the mid-1990s over northern mid-latitudes are mainly due to decreases in clouds and aerosols. Despite some indications from measurements at a few stations, no statistically significant decreases in UV-B radiation attributable to the beginning of the ozone recovery have yet been detected. Projections for erythemal irradiance (UVery) suggest the following changes by the end of the 21(st) century (2090-2100) relative to the present time (2010-2020): (1) Ozone recovery (due to decreasing ozone-depleting substances and increasing greenhouse gases) would cause decreases in UVery, which will be highest (up to 40%) over Antarctica. Decreases would be small (less than 10%) outside the southern Polar Regions. A possible decline of solar activity during the 21(st) century might affect UV-B radiation at the surface indirectly through changes induced in stratospheric ozone. (2) The projected changes in cloud cover would lead to relatively small effects (less than 3%), except at northern high latitudes where increases in cloud cover could lead to decreases in UVery by up to 7%. (3) Reductions in reflectivity due to the melting of sea-ice in the Arctic would lead to decreases of UVery by up to 10%, while at the margins of the Antarctic the decreases would be smaller (2-3%). The melting of the sea-ice would expose the ocean surface formerly covered by ice to UV-B radiation up to 10 times stronger than before. (4) The expected improvement of air-quality and reductions of aerosols over the most populated areas of the northern hemisphere may result in 10-20% increases in UVery, except over China where even larger increases are projected. The projected aerosol effect for the southern hemisphere is generally very small. Aerosols are possibly the most important factor for future UV levels over heavily populated areas, but their project...

Trends in erythemal doses at the Polish Polar Station, Hornsund, Svalbard based on the homogenized measurements (1996–2016) and reconstructed data (1983–1995)

“…The downward UV tendency in the Arctic will also be induced by the increase in the cloudiness, and lowering of the ground albedo due to the snow and sea-ice melting (e.g., Bais et al, 2015).…”

The Network for the Detection of Atmospheric Composition Change (NDACC): History, status and perspectives

“…reported by Seckmeyer et al (2008a) and Bais et al (2015) because wavelengths in the UV-B range contribute about 90% to the erythemal dose. Differences between corresponding latitudes in the Northern and Southern Hemispheres can be attributed to differences in cloudiness, total ozone, aerosol loading, Sun-Earth separation, altitude, and albedo [Seckmeyer et al, 2008b;Bais et al, 10 24 Atmos.…”

“…Latitudinal variations in the annual doses of UV-B (280 -315 nm) and UV-A (315 -400 nm) radiation have recently been assessed using data from NDACC UV spectroradiometers [Braathen, 2015;Bais et al, 2015]. In Fig. 14, we present an expanded comparison of latitudinal differences between the annual UV-A dose and the annual erythemal dose, i.e., the dose on a horizontal surface quantifying the ability of UV radiation to cause sunburn [McKinlay and Diffey, 1987].…”

Reconstruction and analysis of erythemal UV radiation time series from Hradec Králové (Czech Republic) over the past 50 years

“…In spite of the ozone layer recovery since the mid-1990s, this period does not reveal any statistically significant changes in EUV irradiation (Hadzimustafic et al, 2013). At the same time, an estimate of future trend in UV radiation remains unclear because it is often overlaid by the influence of cloudiness and aerosols, whose trends significantly vary at different European sites (Bais et al, 2015).…”

“…Ozone, together with molecular oxygen, absorbs all UV-C and a part of UV-B radiation, which are the most harmful ones to organisms (Bais, 2015). The changes in UV radiation are further modulated by cloudiness and cloud types, atmospheric aerosols, solar zenith angle, and the altitude and ground surface characteristics of the location (Kerr, 2005).…”