2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0924-977x(03)91899-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

P.1.189 Venlafaxine and SSRIs: Pooled remission analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While not significant, the remission rate for the SSRI arm in this trial was higher than the placebo arm (39% and 30%, respectively). These rates are marginally higher, but in agreement with, a pooled analysis of double-blind, randomized sertraline trials totaling over 4000 patients with MDD (35% and 24% for sertraline and placebo, respectively) [44]. We report evidence of early-treatment CT and volume alterations that differentially associate with clinical treatment response across placebo and sertraline treatment groups.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While not significant, the remission rate for the SSRI arm in this trial was higher than the placebo arm (39% and 30%, respectively). These rates are marginally higher, but in agreement with, a pooled analysis of double-blind, randomized sertraline trials totaling over 4000 patients with MDD (35% and 24% for sertraline and placebo, respectively) [44]. We report evidence of early-treatment CT and volume alterations that differentially associate with clinical treatment response across placebo and sertraline treatment groups.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Therefore, if pretreatment and early-treatment structural data were presently translated to the clinic as a biomarker for treatment response, 97.6% of patients would be expected to not remit. Clearly, a treatment biomarker that classifies 2% of patients as remitters, when SSRI remission rates are typically in the range of 30-40% [44], is not at a stage to be of immediate clinical use. The fact that the expected, and experimentally determined, nonremission rate for sertraline is approximately 60-70% makes the threshold for accepting a treatment response predictor much higher than if response rates were higher.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in clinical example 1, the 8 venlafaxine studies for the pooled analysis were selected because they were used for registration with the US Food and Drug Administration (28). A subsequent pooled analysis, the Comprehensive Pooled Analysis of Remission Data (COMPARE), included the full dataset of 33 published and unpublished Wyeth-sponsored studies of venlafaxine (29) and confirmed the earlier analysis results.…”
Section: Clinical Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,15 Despite the broadly similar efficacy of different antidepressants in preventing relapse, there is growing evidence that they are not all equally effective in terms of speed of response and degree of remission. [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] The long-feared absolute mechanistic barrier to a fast action seems to have been a red herring, although the most widely prescribed group, the SSRIs, do have a built-in limitation because of their negative feedback action upon 5-HT autoreceptors. 11,24 Of the current antidepressants, the evidence for faster action and more remission is strongest for the two dual action agents, venlafaxine [21][22][23] and mirtazapine [16][17][18][19][20] , although there is emerging data on a third such drug, duloxetine.…”
Section: Recoverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] The long-feared absolute mechanistic barrier to a fast action seems to have been a red herring, although the most widely prescribed group, the SSRIs, do have a built-in limitation because of their negative feedback action upon 5-HT autoreceptors. 11,24 Of the current antidepressants, the evidence for faster action and more remission is strongest for the two dual action agents, venlafaxine [21][22][23] and mirtazapine [16][17][18][19][20] , although there is emerging data on a third such drug, duloxetine. 25 Such inferences can only be drawn when a consistent advantage is demonstrated across multiple methodologies, of which the most rigorous and sensitive appears to be survival analysis.…”
Section: Recoverymentioning
confidence: 99%