P-165 Opportunities for surgical treatment of elderly patients with head and neck tumors

Yakovleva, L. P.; Кропотов, М. А.; Khodos, A. V.; Tigrov, M. S.; Vyalov, А. S.; Gavrishchuk, P. A.; Bochkar, V A; Guseinov, Ilgar I.; Alizade, Gulnara R.

doi:10.1016/s1368-8375(21)00451-6

Oral Oncology

2021

DOI: 10.1016/s1368-8375(21)00451-6

|View full text |Cite

P-165 Opportunities for surgical treatment of elderly patients with head and neck tumors

L. P. Yakovleva

М. А. Кропотов

A. V. Khodos

et al.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2024

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

Recurrent oropharyngeal cancer: Analysis of surgical treatment outcomes

Ilkaev,

Gvetadze,

Roshchina

et al. 2024

World J Otorhinolaryngol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BACKGROUND The main goal of our research is to introduce transoral robotic surgery and laser resection (TLR) as a considerable way of treating patients with recurrent oropharyngeal malignancies. AIM To develop a foundation of minimally invasive transoral surgical technique for patients with oropharyngeal recurrence. METHODS This study prospectively and retrospectively included patients with recurrent tumors from 2003 to 2018. Subjects were allocated into two groups: (1) Group I; underwent TLR; and (2) Group II (control); underwent open surgeries of varying volume. Evaluation was done with intraoperative blood loss, postoperative infection incidence, and quality of life using the scale for patients with head and neck tumors known as the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Head & Neck Scale. RESULTS One-hundred and forty one patients were included (103 males and 38 females), in 82 cases (85.4%), a recurrent tumor developed earlier than a year after primary tumor therapy; forty-six were in group I and 69 in group II, age ranging from 18 years to 86 years (average: 57.6 years). The first group showed a statistically significant less amount of blood loss and a decreased incidence of infectious complications (P < 0.05). Additionally, there was a significant difference in functional outcomes (quality of life scores) but no significant difference in survival curves. CONCLUSION In properly elected patients, TLR is not just reasonable but tends to be a favorable alternative for recurrent oropharyngeal cancers compared to the outcomes of the open surgery group.

show abstract

Recurrent oropharyngeal cancer: Analysis of surgical treatment outcomes

Ilkaev,

Gvetadze,

Roshchina

et al. 2024

World J Otorhinolaryngol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

P-165 Opportunities for surgical treatment of elderly patients with head and neck tumors

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

Recurrent oropharyngeal cancer: Analysis of surgical treatment outcomes

Recurrent oropharyngeal cancer: Analysis of surgical treatment outcomes

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About