2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2019.12.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

P.224 Primary food cues engage pathways involved in over-eating and reward-seeking in rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The perforated ball in our study was already present in the home cage prior to single-housing, and all the baseline food intake measurements took place after the PB tastings, in such a way that any contextual cues (i.e., the sudden presence of a new object in the cage or associative contextualization of the home cage with PB intake) could not have influenced the results. In a nutshell, our behavioral approach [ 19 ] allowed us not only to investigate long-term feeding outcomes in response to food-linked olfactory cues with small disturbance to the animals, but also to selectively isolate the cue-dependent effects from the associative learning context, which, per se , influence food intake [ 20 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The perforated ball in our study was already present in the home cage prior to single-housing, and all the baseline food intake measurements took place after the PB tastings, in such a way that any contextual cues (i.e., the sudden presence of a new object in the cage or associative contextualization of the home cage with PB intake) could not have influenced the results. In a nutshell, our behavioral approach [ 19 ] allowed us not only to investigate long-term feeding outcomes in response to food-linked olfactory cues with small disturbance to the animals, but also to selectively isolate the cue-dependent effects from the associative learning context, which, per se , influence food intake [ 20 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They had ad libitum access to water and chow (2016 Teklad diet, Harlan Laboratories, Cambridgeshire, UK), unless otherwise stated, and were kept under standard conditions of temperature (20 ± 2 °C) and humidity (50 ± 10%) on a 12 h light–dark cycle (lights on at 7:00 a.m.) for the duration of the studies. We used a behavioral preparation [ 19 ], in which a metallic, perforated, opaque tea-strainer ball was suspended from each animal’s cage lid prior to single housing to avoid neophobia (to ensure that the animals were familiar with the set up before each experiment started) and to prevent it from becoming a non-food related contextual cue [ 20 ]. During experiments, this device contained the inaccessible palatable food (peanut butter, PB; Skippy, Hormel foods, Austin, MN, USA), delivering an olfactory cue to the home environment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Single-housed adult male Sprague-Dawley rats and C57BL/6N mice were used. We used a behavioral preparation firstly developed in our lab (18), in which a metallic, perforated, opaque tea-strainer ball was suspended from each animal's cage lid prior to single housing. During experiments, this device contained the inaccessible palatable food (peanut butter, PB; Skippy, Hormel foods, Austin, MN, USA).…”
Section: Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we sought to discover whether a chronic exposure to an olfactory palatable food-evoking cue can increase the intake of a less palatable but readily available food, such as regular chow, in sated rats subjected to a palatable home-cage hidden-food paradigm (18). Animals were exposed to an olfactory cue-rich environment recalling the palatable food whilst having access exclusively to chow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%