1983
DOI: 10.1016/s0261-5614(83)80131-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

P.23 Prognostic nutritional index. Connection between the preoperative nutritional state and the postoperative course

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1990
1990
1990
1990

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the criteria for LPEM used by other authors were applied to our studied population, the prevalence was 4.1% according to Asplund et al (16), 2.6% according to Jensen et al (17), and 2.8% according to Warnold et al (18). The concordance of the patient groups selected by the different methods was moderate, as is shown in Figure 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…When the criteria for LPEM used by other authors were applied to our studied population, the prevalence was 4.1% according to Asplund et al (16), 2.6% according to Jensen et al (17), and 2.8% according to Warnold et al (18). The concordance of the patient groups selected by the different methods was moderate, as is shown in Figure 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%