2013
DOI: 10.1016/s0924-977x(13)70809-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

P.4.a.005 Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the combat exposure scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[32] Symptom frequency and intensity were used to determine PTSD status using the liberal rule (frequency ≥1, intensity ≥2) proposed by Weathers et al [33] The intensity of combat-related trauma was evaluated using the Combat Exposure Scale (CES), [34] which is a widely used measure of combat exposure among war veterans. The responses to the seven CES questions were used to divide veterans into six categories of combat exposure: no combat (0), light (1-8), light-moderate (9-16), moderate (17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24), moderate-heavy (25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32), and heavy (33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41). The Korean version of the CES was translated and validated by our research group (Cronbach's α = .85).…”
Section: Clinical Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[32] Symptom frequency and intensity were used to determine PTSD status using the liberal rule (frequency ≥1, intensity ≥2) proposed by Weathers et al [33] The intensity of combat-related trauma was evaluated using the Combat Exposure Scale (CES), [34] which is a widely used measure of combat exposure among war veterans. The responses to the seven CES questions were used to divide veterans into six categories of combat exposure: no combat (0), light (1-8), light-moderate (9-16), moderate (17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24), moderate-heavy (25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32), and heavy (33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41). The Korean version of the CES was translated and validated by our research group (Cronbach's α = .85).…”
Section: Clinical Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Korean version of the CES was translated and validated by our research group (Cronbach's α = .85). [35] Alcohol-related problems were assessed by self-reporting of the amount and frequency of alcohol consumption per week and by responses to the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT). [36] The AUDIT was designed by the World Health Organization to identify adults with harmful patterns of alcohol consumption.…”
Section: Clinical Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Criterion validity was calculated with the sample of 145 Korean veterans who were allocated in two groups: PTSD and non-PTSD. The mean difference on combat exposure between the PTSD group (M = 20.4, SD = 9) and the non-PTSD group (M = 12, SD = 8.6) was significant (p , .001; Kim et al, 2013). Relationship between the Korean version of the CES was significant with a clinician administered measure of PTSD (r = .52, p , .001) and a Korean version of the life event checklist (r = .31, p , .001).…”
Section: Combat Exposure Measuresmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Each item measured exposure to a variety of combat-related situations. Accordingly, Kim et al [ 20 ] translated the combat exposure scale into Korean, which is widely used in combat-related PTSD research and has been recognized for its high validity and reliability. After verifying its validity and reliability, we developed a Korean version of the CES that can be used to evaluate the intensity of combat-related trauma in clinical practice [ 20 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After verifying its validity and reliability, we developed a Korean version of the CES that can be used to evaluate the intensity of combat-related trauma in clinical practice. 20…”
Section: Combat Exposure Scale-koreamentioning
confidence: 99%