1990
DOI: 10.1016/0197-2456(90)90157-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

·P-58 Power and sample size calculations: A review and computer program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
787
0
14

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 748 publications
(820 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
787
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…We performed an a priori power analysis for Student's t test and for Fisher's exact test, which were to be used for the comparisons between the two groups at an alpha level of 0.05 using the PS program (http://biostat. mc.vanderbilt.edu/wiki/Main/PowerSampleSize) [14]. We regarded the following differences as clinically meaningful: greater than 50 mL in drained volume, 0.5 mg/dL in hemoglobin level, 10% in the incidence of bleeding-related wound problems, 10°motion arc, and 10% of maximum points in functional outcome scales.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We performed an a priori power analysis for Student's t test and for Fisher's exact test, which were to be used for the comparisons between the two groups at an alpha level of 0.05 using the PS program (http://biostat. mc.vanderbilt.edu/wiki/Main/PowerSampleSize) [14]. We regarded the following differences as clinically meaningful: greater than 50 mL in drained volume, 0.5 mg/dL in hemoglobin level, 10% in the incidence of bleeding-related wound problems, 10°motion arc, and 10% of maximum points in functional outcome scales.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11,19,20]. According to the IRLSSG rating scale, severity was classified as mild (<11 on the IRLSSG rating scale), moderate (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20), severe (21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30), and very severe (31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40) [21]. The Page 6 of 35 prevalence of RLS found in that study was 26.6% (154/579).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The minimum number of subjects required to detect a ratio of median survival times (experimental group/control group) with a certain power and a two sided type I error probability of 5% was estimated [23,24]. A study power of 80% corresponds to a mean survival times ratio of 0.70 for the above given sample size of patients (154 with RLS) and controls (425 without RLS).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sample size was calculated according to Dupont and Plummer. 18 To account for possible dropouts, a sample size of 12 subjects was chosen for this trial.…”
Section: Magnetic Resonance Image Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%