Encyclopedia of the Alkaloids 1977
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-8807-8_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

P

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Computation played a key role in establishing this theorem. The Magma code available at [3] was useful for both conjecturing the truth of Theorem 2.5, and for discovering the key identity of Lemma 7.5 from which we constructed our proof. First we show that G(r, p) has a generating set of size less than rp.…”
Section: The Groups G(r P)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Computation played a key role in establishing this theorem. The Magma code available at [3] was useful for both conjecturing the truth of Theorem 2.5, and for discovering the key identity of Lemma 7.5 from which we constructed our proof. First we show that G(r, p) has a generating set of size less than rp.…”
Section: The Groups G(r P)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed we prove in Theorem 2.5 that G(r, p) = S a ≀ D b is a wreath product of a the symmetric group of degree a, and the dihedral group of degree b. We discovered the essential idea for the proof by using a Magma computer programs available at [3]. This computational insight allowed us to replace a number of difficult partial results with a relatively short proof of Theorem 2.5.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To prove Theorem 3.1 we need a technical lemma which we have not been able to find in the literature, see [4]. Lemma 3.2 below says i 1 λ i = i 1 λ ′ i when k = 1.…”
Section: Conjugate Partitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further by Theorem 2.9 dim(C(N λ , N µ )) = i 1 λ ′ i µ ′ i where, as usual, λ ′ and µ ′ denote conjugate partitions. We use the observation: (4) if 0 x a and 0 y b, then (a − x)(b − y) + xy ab to show that dim (C(A, B)…”
Section: Upper and Lower Bounds For Dim Fmentioning
confidence: 99%